Quote:
Originally Posted by Ch2tf
I now see how, no matter how much it is explained to you, and no matter how many sources you are referred to with regards to colonization and race as a social construct, you are not going to get it. I'll ask someone to pray for you because I don't even have the patience to do that.
|
If people didn't integrate, there wouldn't be a such thing as colonization and there wouldn't be a such thing as racism, hence, there would not be a such thing as racial distinction. Maybe a such thing as class, higher and lower but not racism hence racial distinction. If not for colonailsim, theft of land and intergration, we would not be talking about Social Construction. Do you understand that? I don't care if you try and turn this around to make it seem as though I just don't get it. Bottom line, Social construction wouldn't have been thought of, if there wasn't some type of underlining propaganda to detour the not well thought out futurisitic/present results due to colonialism, integration and theft of land. Perfect example, South Africa.
Social Construction:
A social construction, or social construct, according to the school of social constructionism, is an idea which may appear to be natural and obvious to those who accept it, but in reality is an invention or artifact of a particular culture or society. The implication is that social constructs are human choices rather than laws of God or nature
Threaded Mode
