If Hazing is Wrong, what's a better alternative?

[KSUViolet06]

Originally Posted by msl2008

harvard has a tough admissions process where only 20% of applicants get in or even lower. thus it is exclusive. if there was a non hazing program that could do this, then i would definitely consider it. in the abscence of that, the only way i see to make people quit is hazing. it might be wrong but i find a problem when everyone is accepted into an organization b/c it dilutes the quality. what if everyone was a doctor or everyone was a CFA/CPA or any licensed thing. no one would want that rite? thus we need something that can weed out people. hazing does that. also, a non hazing program that automatically dropped 40-50% of pledges could also do that and i'd probably be ok with that too.

But why make people quit?

Here's a thought, you could only take on those highly qualified applicants from jump street, and not have to be bothered with "weeding out" anyone.

This thread makes my heard hurt. i'm going back to Recruitment, lol.