Quote:
Originally Posted by wreckingcrew
A&M wasn't still on probation from the 1988 instance when the 1993 incident occurred. There had been a change in the entire power structure of the Athletic Department, from the AD on down to the football coaches. But the key is, we were put on probation, followed the statutes and came off cleanly before our second incident. OU was STILL on probation and if something supposedly as minor as 'too many text messages' can land you in trouble then you would think the AD would look to designate a staff member to review every aspect of the football team's dealings to ensure that the most attention grabbing team in the AD wasn't running afowl of the rules.
|
Including checking the time cards of every single student athlete against practice schedules? Seriously?
My sister in law works in an NCAA position. What you're expecting just isn't realistic. Those folks have to put up with enough B.S. without having to keep tabs on every single student athlete and their job situation.
I think your expectations are somewhat unrealistic.
Or perhaps you're just wishing that they would take away the 2004 wins as well?
Threaded Mode
