GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > Recruitment > Sorority Recruitment
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Sorority Recruitment Recruitment event and bid day ideas, membership retention, publicity, recruitment policies, etc.

» GC Stats
Members: 331,774
Threads: 115,718
Posts: 2,207,855
Welcome to our newest member, zhalypittz4418
» Online Users: 4,787
1 members and 4,786 guests
amIblue?
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-20-2014, 09:32 PM
HQWest HQWest is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,028
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoosierxgirl View Post
Whoa whoa whoa...I NEVER said anything about how good or bad a sisterhood would be. Big or small. In fact, I said the experience would be mostly positive.

I am saying that it would be a large adjustment and that the logistics would be harder to overcome for a system that isn't used to such large chapters (I tend to think 150 women is pretty large) I think we already do many of things you just described (event centers, buses, committees, etc.) as well.

I'm not saying it can't be done or it shouldn't be done. I'm just pointing out one little reason why suddenly switching to a quota system would be hard.

And again, I'm not turning my nose up at anyone. I'm pointing out a popular opinion that has been raised in my time at IU. I do not condone that opinion nor do I claim to hold it.
Mostly positive is by definition not positive.
And just because it is different then your experience does not mean it could not be as good or better.
  #2  
Old 01-20-2014, 09:45 PM
Hoosierxgirl Hoosierxgirl is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 69
Quote:
Originally Posted by HQWest View Post
Mostly positive is by definition not positive.
And just because it is different then your experience does not mean it could not be as good or better.
I never said that. Once again I am making clearly that these are not MY opinions. These are things that have been brought up many people in the Greek System and contribute to why this system hasn't changed in 30+ years.

I know the process is flawed and I know it needs to be changed. When I was a Rho Gamma, it broke my heart that almost half of my group didn't receive bids. Especially because I knew most of them would have made very positive additions to the Greek System. It also broke my heart that my sister and I were the only women from our dorm floor to get bids - and we were both CORs. It's awful for everyone involved.

I think many of your have excellent points and the further removed I get from the IU recruitment process, the more I see the issues. I think we can all agree that something needs to be and that is going to take a huge shift in attitude and culture.
__________________

  #3  
Old 01-20-2014, 09:57 PM
33girl 33girl is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hotel Oceanview
Posts: 34,574
Quote:
Originally Posted by Titchou View Post
I have no clue how this got slanted to house corporations being an issue.
I don't either, except for maybe the house corps are the ones most concerned with OMG MUST FILL HOUSE and not wanting to do anything to upset the applecart. That is how I took it, anyway.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeltaBetaBaby View Post


I...can't think of a single chapter for which that is true.
I can.

Quote:
Originally Posted by HQWest View Post
(BTW - Texas A&M, U. Texas, The Ohio State, Penn State, Florida - are all bigger than IUB AND have flourishing Greek life AND they rank higher too.)
I know the argument you're trying to make and agree with it, but Penn State really isn't a good one to throw into this since the sororities have suites instead of houses. Also the fact that Pennsylvania has extremely parochial liquor laws (i.e. you don't mind leaving the suite your senior year) plays into it too.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhomom View Post
Lastly, IU admissions has no control over the current system, nor does the administration, the board of trustees or the dean of students. Short of removing sororities from campus, their hands are tied. I know this because I am also an IU "employee". Believe me, we are bracing for unhappy students and parents, and are very, very tired of the way things are done. The only people that can change this is panhel, individual nationals and NPC.
Could the administration derecognize groups if they don't adopt (example) a senior live-out policy? Kind of like if the states didn't adopt the 21 drinking age they forfeited federal highway funding?

If you are comfortable with it, could you elaborate as to why exactly their hands are so tied? GLOs are on campuses at the invitation of the campus. There have been lots of instances of things on here that GLOs didn't like or were flat out against policy that they had to do because the campus said so.

And everyone needs to chill on the IU students that are posting here and think about how you would have felt when you were 18-21 and someone proposed something that to your line of thinking would completely change your life. Good Lord, I've heard of knock down drag-outs in Panhellenics over raising or lowering total by 5 people. This is quite a bit more of a deal.
__________________
It is all 33girl's fault. ~DrPhil
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Indiana 2014 Recruitment Schedule IndianaSigKap Sorority Recruitment 13 06-02-2013 05:12 PM
Indiana University New Recruitment brighteyedgirl Sorority Recruitment 35 03-18-2013 11:22 AM
Indiana University Recruitment IUGreekGirl Sorority Recruitment 364 02-20-2011 09:10 PM
Indiana University Recruitment heu173 Sorority Recruitment 0 02-04-2010 04:15 PM
Indiana University recruitment AZ-AlphaXi Recruitment 18 01-18-2004 10:20 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.