GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > General Chat Topics > News & Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

» GC Stats
Members: 329,743
Threads: 115,668
Posts: 2,205,139
Welcome to our newest member, loganttso2709
» Online Users: 2,366
0 members and 2,366 guests
No Members online
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #22  
Old 03-18-2013, 09:20 AM
AOII Angel AOII Angel is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Santa Monica/Beverly Hills
Posts: 8,634
Quote:
Originally Posted by StealthMode View Post
Agreed.


This is the part I didn't get--what do the first 2 sentences have to do with each other? What I mean is, why single out abstinence-only programs if even standard or "excellent" sex ed courses do not address the extremely important subject of consent either? Pointing to the former implies that they contribute to the problem more than any other sex ed program which seems to be the message below.

This is where we disagree--I see this as a very slippery slope argument. It's opposite from what people who push abstinence-only programs tend to say but it's just as fallible (to me) as saying those who get proper sex ed would take it as a green light to sleep with everyone. Both types of programs have their good and bad points. IMO the basic message I get from Ab-only is "Good girls don't have sex before they're women (i.e., graduated, married, however it's defined)." In an ideal world theres, nothing wrong with that expectation but a standard sex ed class operates from a more realistic viewpoint like AOII Angel said. Sometimes, the good girls do have sex before they are women--that fact may fall short of the standard set by the program but that doesn't skip straight to slut shaming.

But you're right about it being EXTREMELY obvious that any sexual act with an unconscious girl is not permissible in any way. Additional education aside, that's a basic question of right and wrong. Even if these 2 were in a school that had NO sex ed at all, a 17-year-old and a 16-year-old would still be expected to know better and act accordingly.
You are missing the point that we discussed ADDING a discussion of consent to a good sex education program. In an abstinence only program, they would NOT be okay with adding this because the baseline assumption is that all students will say no to sex at all times until they get married. No one has suggested that abstinence only education has made people into rapists. We are arguing that it inhibits proper education. I can just imagine the heads rolling and the frothing at the mouth should schools start talking about sexual consent at schools in the South. Oh Lawd!
__________________

AOII

One Motto, One Badge, One Bond and Singleness of Heart!




Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pregnant 14-Year-Old Says Having a Child Is the Newest Fashion Among Teens jon1856 News & Politics 49 03-05-2007 02:41 AM
Students In Hazing Incident Plead Guilty, Face Dismissal (Follow Up On Platsburgh) moe.ron Risk Management - Hazing & etc. 17 06-03-2004 03:05 PM
Two of 18 defendants plead guilty in gang rape case CrimsonTide4 Delta Sigma Theta 14 05-02-2003 11:16 AM
NJ H.S. hazers and adults face jail time hoosier Risk Management - Hazing & etc. 0 09-22-2002 03:13 PM
Ohio Sororities face review... DeltAlum Risk Management - Hazing & etc. 2 07-09-2001 10:49 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.