In the "olden days", a baptismal certificate (in some places) was considered on par with a birth certificate. This would have been even better if it was a baptismal certificate pretty much filled out in pencil on a random scrap of paper by ,by the presiding priest or whatever....
In the "olden days", a baptismal certificate (in some places) was considered on par with a birth certificate. This would have been even better if it was a baptismal certificate pretty much filled out in pencil on a random scrap of paper by ,by the presiding priest or whatever....
That's what Arizona was trying to include as valid identification of birth, baptismal and circumcision records as well as official ones. As you point out, there's little proof there.
__________________
From the SigmaTo the K!
Polyamorous, Pansexual and Proud of it! It Gets Better
Hybrid Mode
