Quote:
Originally Posted by ree-Xi
OP does a lot of digging around in other people's backyards.
He has changed other organizations' Wiki pages.
He's also working on this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikiped...and_Sororities
My suspicions have been raised for quite a while. My gut is usually never wrong. |
In regards to suspicions, yes, I am on the Fraternities and Sororities Project, right now I am currently involved with fighting off a jackass who is trying to add specific inappropriate things to the Kappa Sigma Page.
If you want to take a look at my Wikipedia pages, checking out the pages I created and continue to expand on Notable Alpha Phi Omega Brothers, Alpha Phi Omega chapters for both the US and the Philippines and for the Alpha Phi Omega Conventions would be a place to start. (I'm on Alpha Phi Omega's National History Committee).
And with the possible exception of the issue when someone claiming to be (correctly but unverifiably) a Gamma Sigma Sigma board member went through and made unreferenced changes to the Gamma Sigma Sigma page to reflect the change in tone from the schools that founded to the organizations that founded, I don't think any of the changes on Wikipedia that I've made have been controversial in a way that members of GLOs would be on the other side...
If I try this question here on GC every nine years, that paper must have a lot of dust on it...
Of the possible reasons listed for why I asked, Dr Phil's
Is the intent a follow-up to that other hazing thread and to convince aspirants that it isn't so bad, afterall, come join us?
is probably closest.
--KnightShadow
Threaded Mode
