GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > General Chat Topics > News & Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

» GC Stats
Members: 331,357
Threads: 115,705
Posts: 2,207,499
Welcome to our newest member, samuelswito7497
» Online Users: 3,116
1 members and 3,115 guests
ChioLu
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-05-2008, 06:13 PM
UGAalum94 UGAalum94 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Atlanta area
Posts: 5,382
Quote:
Originally Posted by KSig RC View Post
Ironically, this addresses an issue that UGA brought up earlier that I didn't want to address for lack of data . . . however, Silver has already discussed it, so I'll go ahead an appeal to oracle.

The reason why the Bradley Effect should have been completely discounted this election? There are TONS of people (white, black and in between) who are excited to "be a part of history" - this would, nearly by definition, offset any real or perceived Bradley Effect. Again - mobilizing the electorate was Obama's coup . . . keeping that momentum is the key.
I'm happy that there seems to be a good match-up between what people said publicly about who they were going to vote for and who they did vote for. I think it represents some progress.

But there was a chance that people were going to publicly bask in the glow of being on the side of history while privately voting otherwise. It's the ability to claim whatever you want about your vote that introduces the possible play in the results, not so much, to me anyway, actual racism or whatever.

I'm pleasantly surprised that there were fewer hypocrites of this sort than I had thought and I'm amazed by the accuracy of 538 data.

Maybe I should have realized that anyone actually likely to vote Republican gave up any pride about what other people thought about them or their politics sometime in the last four years and therefore had no reason to fib to pollsters.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-05-2008, 07:58 PM
KSig RC KSig RC is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Who you calling "boy"? The name's Hand Banana . . .
Posts: 6,984
Quote:
Originally Posted by UGAalum94 View Post
I'm happy that there seems to be a good match-up between what people said publicly about who they were going to vote for and who they did vote for. I think it represents some progress.

But there was a chance that people were going to publicly bask in the glow of being on the side of history while privately voting otherwise. It's the ability to claim whatever you want about your vote that introduces the possible play in the results, not so much, to me anyway, actual racism or whatever.
It was certainly something that we didn't really know how to account for before, but it looks like it either did not exist at all, or that it was offset by other factors. All in all, very interesting.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What concerns you about Election 2008? LightBulb Chit Chat 64 11-12-2008 11:57 PM
2008 Presidential Election: Who are you voting for? Kevin News & Politics 128 10-29-2008 06:36 PM
Election 2008 BetteDavisEyes News & Politics 77 09-23-2008 11:17 PM
Election 2008 and the State of America by the numbers DaemonSeid News & Politics 8 04-15-2008 11:03 PM
another spring 2008 live recruitment thread! EskimoGirl Recruitment Stories 70 03-19-2008 11:40 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.