Apparantly speaking the truth is once again NOT allowed in RUSH threads...

[PenguinTrax]

I would have answered, but I was too busy shopping for Ex-Lax.

[Tippiechick]

Originally Posted by PenguinTrax

I would have answered, but I was too busy shopping for Ex-Lax.

Wow, I think that violates the TOS as rudeness...

I would have given you more of a response, but I am far too busy to care about how the good people of Greekchat worry about me.

[PenguinTrax]

Originally Posted by Tippiechick

Wow, I think that violates the TOS as rudeness...
.

It's called sarcasm....oh wait, I did it again.

[Tippiechick]

Originally Posted by PenguinTrax

It's called sarcasm....oh wait, I did it again.

Your sarcasm is other people's rudeness... See how easy it is to have snarkiness misconstrued?

[kddani]

Originally Posted by PenguinTrax

It's called sarcasm....oh wait, I did it again.

That's pretty hypocritical. You want to dictate to people what they can and cannot post and then you go and be snarky and rude and everything you tell people not to be.

[texas*princess]

I agree kddani.

I think this goes back to the whole 'modding across the boards" thing... because apparently it's only inappropriate to be sarcastic in the Recruitment Forum, but everywhere else, it's OK.

[srmom]

Is it just me, or do some people have too much time on their hands?

[KeepingUHonest]

Speaking of hypocritical,

Originally Posted by Jen

This is why I avoid the rush forums. There's no point in posting in them, because they only want certain kinds of posts. Ones without any personal opinions.

It doesn't reflect on any sorority that initiates an AI if that sorority was not aware of the fact the person they initiated shopped around until someone said yes. It reflects on the member as an individual. If that sorority was aware of the shopping and okay with it, then it reflects on them. Some people may think it reflects poorly, some may not.

But only those that hold the "may not" opinion are allowed to express their views in the Rush forums.

Remember this post from Jen (formerly known as Ariesrising?)

ariesrising  Registered User Join Date: Jun 2000 Location: Area code 99 Posts: 1,924 I think going through AI is 10 times harder than recruitment. I agree with adduncan, there are a lot of different views of AI's among alumnae groups and individual members, and I'm sure some people think it's tacky for a PNAM to want to meet more than one group. Personally I think it's best if a PNAM does meet more than one group...I think you get a better sense of your connection to a group when you have something to compare it against. But for those of you that are just SOOO curious about what groups are in my area, I'll post it in my thread lol. It's easy enough to find out with a little research, so I don't think telling that is such a big deal.

[BetteDavisEyes]

^^^Who are you KeepingUHonest?

[KSig RC]

Originally Posted by KeepingUHonest

Speaking of hypocritical,

Remember this post from Jen (formerly known as Ariesrising?)

Are you serious? You created a sockpuppet for this post?

To butcher Ron Burgundy, I'm not even mad - just wow. This might be the single dumbest thing I've ever read in my entire life - and I've read every ufpike post 35x (they're in a puff-painted 3-ring binder underneath my embroidered KSig pillow). My mind is spinning.

[texas*princess]

I think that post could have been made without the use of a whole other screen name.. but that's just mho.

back to where the thread was before that post - I think it's pretty ridiculous to only accept sarcasm in certain forums

[epchick]

Apparently speaking ANYTHING except praises to/about Carnation (including her kids) or PT is not allowed in rush threads.

Originally Posted by epchick

Apparently speaking ANYTHING except praises to/about Carnation (including her kids) or PT is not allowed in rush threads.

Fixed that for 'ya.

[epchick]

Originally Posted by OTW

Fixed that for 'ya.

Thanks, I didn't even think about about part! lol