Quote:
Originally Posted by DaemonSeid
WOW!!!
Very astute observation on this....I think pretty much Obama called McCain's bluff on ducking the debate and seeing as Congress has it in hand, let them deal with it unless he ABSOLUTELY feels a need to be there.
Even the Repubs in session agree that progress has been made and that altho nothing is in stone as of yet....it's being handled. No deadlocks no filibusters...everyone is playing nice...so WHY CANCEL?
So again..let's answer this experience question....
Would you rather have a pres who drops everything else to go deal with one problem or a pres who will prioritize and do what's best to handle multiple problems?
|
I'm sorry I don't think that going on TV to answer questions that everyone already knows your answers to ranks up there with working out a solution to one of the biggest economic issues in recent memory. And he hasn't cancelled, he's saying he will be there if they can get something passed and wants to reschedule it if they're still working.
And there aren't multiple problems. You are looking at one problem and one glorified speech. The same thing everyone lambasted Bush for on 9/11, he didn't stop his speech and get his ass to Washington fast enough to deal with a problem.
Now McCain went to Washington to address a problem and Democrats are complaining that he won't commit to giving a speech.
And the idea that McCain is ducking a debate seems ludicrous seeing as how in the closest thing we've had to a debate thus far Obama got his ass handed to him. Debating wasn't Obama's strong point in the primaries, McCain is at his best in his "town hall forums", so according to you he's "ducking" one of the biggest advantages he could have left in this race?
I'm not taking McCain at his word, I understand that this is a political ploy. Now please stop responding to me with paraphrased quotes from Obama, because he isn't really worth taking at his word either. I think I called your bluff on that one.