Quote:
Originally Posted by LionInMI
Oh, I'm going to get myself in trouble if I get deeper into this, I probably should have stayed out of it, but I just couldn't help but comment on behalf of the chapters that sometimes have to fight against the release figures tide. Not to say release figures are not positive, I do see the good they can do in the overall process. But they can also create the expectation that since the bigger chapters are being forced to cut heavy and early, that smaller chapters should conversely take anyone that "trickles down" all throughout recruitment. The process is called membership SELECTION for a reason and the chapter members should still have the ultimate say in who they want to bid.
|
Absolutely.
I wonder if there's a way for the system to accommodate this issue. I mean, at the point we're using algorithms to look at individual chapter numbers, couldn't "they" program in a variable for basically unqualified PNMs?
I really don't have that much of an issue with trying really hard to place all the girls who want to go through, but whatever hardship this philosophy creates should be born equally by the groups.
Sure it's a hardship for top groups to cut more girls early, no doubt, but I'm not sure it's equal to having to invite all the girls who were cut by the other groups back.
Threaded Mode
