
06-02-2008, 03:14 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 16,194
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SOPi_Jawbreaker
A 2% difference in DNA may not sound like a lot but it is. I think there is a large amount of shared DNA across many different Eukaryotes, because a large number of our genes are just coding for the basics that we share (e.g. mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi apparatus, nucleus, ribosomes, cell membrane, centrioles, lysozymes, proteins, enzymes, ion channels, metabolic pathways, chemical pathways, replication, transcription, translation, cytokinesis, etc). We share about half our DNA with bananas and cabbages. That sounds like a lot of shared DNA, yet we look nothing like bananas or cabbages. If a 50% is that significant to produce such a difference between humans and fruits/vegetables, then think about how big a difference a 2% is still going to make.
|
Yes, this is true, but this is why I asked the tour guide lady about the small changes in regions of the DNA that have a customary or regular function in the appearance of the organism. That's why I also asked her if it could be a different developmental trajectory between chimps and humans. I mentioned that in an earlier post too.
__________________
Phi Sigma Biological Sciences Honor Society “Daisies that bring you joy are better than roses that bring you sorrow. If I had my life to live over, I'd pick more Daisies!”
|