SEX - Page 6

Leslie Anne · #76 05-08-2008, 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DSTCHAOS

That's like saying it's against nature for humans to do most of the things that we do.

Yep, that's what I'm saying.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DSTCHAOS

If it can be acquired through evolution and nurturing, it is difficult to fully distinguish what human "nature" is in comparison to other animal species.

I don't believe the idea of monogamy is something that can be instilled via evolution. Nuture, yes, via socialization.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DSTCHAOS

Humans are supposed to be different than other animals anyway, right?

I haven't questioned any deities on that lately.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DSTCHAOS

On that note, if there's truly a tie between humans and other animals in that manner, this means that female humans really don't care who spermulates their egg and will go from male to male until the eggulation occurs.

In that case, humans have definitely regulated women more than men because women are called whores when they do this.

On another note, that means that female humans are naturally supposed to be nurturers because they give birth--just as most female animal species are in charge of birth and nurturing.

I'll leave all that to the

factor. I will say that if that were the case, then we've still regulated men more. Women would only sleep around until they were certain they were pregnant. Men, on the other hand, could conceivably inseminate a different woman every day (more or less depending on their stamina).

Quote:

Originally Posted by DSTCHAOS

(I feel a panic attack coming on. I'm glad that we're not relegated to our "nature" or even our "socialization," for that matter.)

As am I.

PrettyBoy · #77 05-08-2008, 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DSTCHAOS

ETA: With exception for individual variation, all humans have the potential to be turned on by nudity. And, no, men are not turned on by ANY female nudity. Men are picky. To believe that they (including YOU) are not is to assume something about biological maleness that has yet to proven true. And reduces grown ass men to 1 year olds who are just discovering their penises exists.

I saw this before I went to work, but I didn't have time to respond to it. LMAO! I was thinking about this all day today at work. We had a meeting and someone told a corny joke, and I was laughing the hardest. It looked like I was laughing at the joke, but I was thinking about this post.

I should have clarified that better. Yes we are picky. I was saying the many shapes or forms as in how it's presented to us. Rather it be in a movie, t.v. magazines or whatever. But yes, some men are picky. I know I am. But, yeah I agree with you on that.

Damn, you are funnnneeeee. LOL.

PrettyBoy · #78 05-08-2008, 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tld221

that's what i was getting at in my head... i havent read the whole thread but im sure this has been pointed out. sex DNE gender. and i really hope PB doesnt think that "most men" are visual and that he is the exception to the "rule" by needing more than that. bah, whatever, at some point we ALL need those things. no one person (man or woman) can go on just on visual attraction.

tld221, I'm not saying I'm the exception to the rule. I'm just saying that some men including me must have a serious monogamous relationship with only one woman. Yes I am visual. Very visual, but at the same time, I want commitment with only one woman. Some men like looking at different body parts on women. For me it's her legs and her feet. I'm sure you all have seen my posts on that. This is important to me. I literally will not get in a relationship with a woman if she's physically lacking in the leg and feet area. She can have a great personality, a pretty face and a bangin' body, but if her feet are jacked, I'll let her know that we can just be friends or associates. I know that's shallow, but it's what I like and a must have in order for me to get involved with her. I am very visual, so I'm not singling myself out at all. You have to go back and read the whole post. I mentioned that some men are like me with the spiritual and emotional connection, but we're still visual.

PrettyBoy · #79 05-08-2008, 06:50 PM

Ladies, I understand you are visual, but men are more visual. In a relationship, I think that both men and women must accept the fact that we're different, and those differences will never change. We have to understand those differences and dwell together according to knowledge. I don't know what makes women tick, but I think it's important in any serious relationship to try and meet as many of each others needs (physically and emotionally) that we possibly can with the resources that we have.

DaemonSeid · #80 05-08-2008, 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PrettyBoy

tld221, I'm not saying I'm the exception to the rule. I'm just saying that some men including me must have a serious monogamous relationship with only one woman. Yes I am visual. Very visual, but at the same time, I want commitment with only one woman. Some men like looking at different body parts on women. For me it's her legs and her feet. I'm sure you all have seen my posts on that. This is important to me. I literally will not get in a relationship with a woman if she's physically lacking in the leg and feet area. She can have a great personality, a pretty face and a bangin' body, but if her feet are jacked, I'll let her know that we can just be friends or associates. I know that's shallow, but it's what I like and a must have in order for me to get involved with her. I am very visual, so I'm not singling myself out at all. You have to go back and read the whole post. I mentioned that some men are like me with the spiritual and emotional connection, but we're still visual.

aight so say if ere'thing is a 10...and she got a corn on her toes...then what

PrettyBoy · #81 05-08-2008, 06:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cheerfulgreek

PrettyBoy, I was trying to see if there was a science to attracting the opposite sex. You arrive and start talking about sperm production, erections and orgasms.

The last time I checked, the title of this thread was called "SEX". The title that "YOU" gave it. Sperm production, erections, and orgasms all fall under SEX.

cheers, I know animals are your thing and all, but if I would have known this thread was about animals mating and you comparing them to people, believe me, I wouldn't have posted on here.

PrettyBoy · #82 05-08-2008, 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaemonSeid

aight so say if ere'thing is a 10...and she got a corn on her toes...then what

If it was a small corn, I would buy her some corn medication so we could get rid of it. If it looked like something hideous, we would just be friends. Her toes have to be aligned right too.

tld221 · #83 05-08-2008, 07:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PrettyBoy

I literally will not get in a relationship with a woman if she's physically lacking in the leg and feet area.

darn, too bad for all those hot amputees. they never stood a chance huh?

Quote:

Originally Posted by PrettyBoy

You have to go back and read the whole post. I mentioned that some men are like me with the spiritual and emotional connection, but we're still visual.

i do real all your posts actually, jarring bold, italic darkred text and all.

but honestly the takeaway was "i know everything about how men operate: were visual, and way more than women!"

what are you really trying to convince us of?

DSTCHAOS · #84 05-08-2008, 07:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PrettyBoy

....but men are more visual.

This assertion is based on........

cheerfulgreek · #85 05-09-2008, 12:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leslie Anne

I think it tends to go against nature for males to be monogamous.

Actually, there are some animals that are monogamous.

cheerfulgreek · #86 05-09-2008, 01:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaemonSeid

it's what I do...sometimes I have that effect on people...but really, I am a very nice guy!

lol

I know. I was kidding when I said you were mean.

DaemonSeid · #87 05-09-2008, 08:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DSTCHAOS

This assertion is based on........

my opinion is that some of us are to overtly obvious and obnoxious about it....

think catcalling....

tld221 · #88 05-09-2008, 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaemonSeid

my opinion is that some of us are to overtly obvious and obnoxious about it....

think catcalling....

can i just mini-rant and go OFF about how annoying and obnoxious (and borderline embarrassing) it is to be catcalled? its like, great, you think im hot but does the whole world need to know what you'd do to me if you had the chance?

does "being visual" mean being a vulgar ass? i mean really. its flattering, but then its really not. theres a difference in being straightforward about your intentions but another to scream out "yo, we f***ing tonight?"

DSTCHAOS · #89 05-09-2008, 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaemonSeid

my opinion is that some of us are to overtly obvious and obnoxious about it....

think catcalling....

That isn't about being more visual than women, though.

That's about this false sense of masculinity and manhood, mixed with insecurity and a need to assert power in the dumbest of contexts.

DaemonSeid · #90 05-09-2008, 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tld221

can i just mini-rant and go OFF about how annoying and obnoxious (and borderline embarrassing) it is to be catcalled? its like, great, you think im hot but does the whole world need to know what you'd do to me if you had the chance?

does "being visual" mean being a vulgar ass? i mean really. its flattering, but then its really not. theres a difference in being straightforward about your intentions but another to scream out "yo, we f***ing tonight?"

HEY BABAY!!!! WASSUP WITCHO' PHOINE @SS SELF!!!