SEX

DSTCHAOS · #1 05-07-2008, 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PrettyBoy

[B][I][COLOR=darkred]
SydneyK, because of sperm production and other factors, men naturally desire a sexual release about every 3 days or so. Some feel this need as often as every couple of days. Others experience it less. While the frequency of the need varies from man to man, each one has his own sexual cycle in which he experiences these physical desires. We receive sexual gratification through our eyes. We don't need a date, and we don't ever need to wait. We have our eyes, which we can use to take in sexual gratification at any time. We're turned on by female nudity in any way, shape, or form. We're not picky either. It can come in a photograph of a nude stranger just as easily as in a romantic interlude with a naked girlfriend. It's almost like we have a visual ignition switch when it comes to viewing the female anatomy. Women seldom understand this because they aren't sexually stimulated in the same way we are. A lot of women view this visual aspect of our sexuality as low down, shallow and dirty, but it's not. It's how we're made.

When it comes to having an orgasm, our minds are on one thing. The actual physical act of sex with the woman. It's that simple. For women, (and I may be wrong here) but for women, orgasm is probably 10% physical and 90% mental. If a man is trying to please his woman, he can forget about it if her mind is a million miles away. For men it's all physical, but generally women need to focus mentally on the sexual experience in order to receive ultimate sexual pleasure.

Sex is a cyclical need for men, meaning, we want it all the time, or whenever we can get it. Hell, we don't even have to look at a woman to get an erection. We can think it, it doesn't take long. Now, women have their own unique cycle. Although physical pleasure may not be a cyclical need for them like it is in men, women long for attention and affection on a regular recurring basis. For example, just as a man would become far more vurnerable to physically cheating if his woman rarely responded to his physical needs for a sexual release, a woman becomes far more vurnerable to physically cheating when her emotional needs are neglected over and over again. When a woman cheats, most often than not, it begins as emotional cheating. A woman's emotional needs are just as vitally important to her as a man's physical needs are to him. I'm not disagreeing with you when you said it's more than that, because for some men it is more than that. The bottom line is for the men who want a long term commitment, we're still visual and want sex on a recurring basis, but of course always with the same woman over and over again.

Eh...this is the worst men's sexuality/sex ed lecture I've read or heard.

I have found that many men know as little about what makes them "tick" as many women know about what makes men "tick." Of course it sounds good for men to think and say that they are visually and sexually driven creatues with this inherent NEED. That solidifies gendered norms of males being systematic, rational, and purpose-driven---even if their actions appear completely irrational. Meanwhile, in all of this, women somehow remain the emotional ones whose actions are expressive and therefore have an opposite motivation than men's actions.

Yikes.

ETA: With exception for individual variation, all humans have the potential to be turned on by nudity. And, no, men are not turned on by ANY female nudity. Men are picky. To believe that they (including YOU) are not is to assume something about biological maleness that has yet to proven true. And reduces grown ass men to 1 year olds who are just discovering their penises exists.

PrettyBoy · #2 05-07-2008, 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DSTCHAOS

Eh...this is the worst men's sexuality/sex ed lecture I've read or heard.

I have found that many men know as little about what makes them "tick" as many women know about what makes men "tick." Of course it sounds good for men to think and say that they are visually and sexually driven creatues with this inherent NEED. That solidifies gendered norms of males being systematic, rational, and purpose-driven---even if their actions appear completely irrational. Meanwhile, in all of this, women somehow remain the emotional ones whose actions are expressive and therefore have an opposite motivation than men's actions.

Yikes.

ETA: With exception for individual variation, all humans have the potential to be turned on by nudity. And, no, men are not turned on by ANY female nudity. Men are picky. To believe that they (including YOU) are not is to assume something about biological maleness that has yet to proven true. And reduces grown ass men to 1 year olds who are just discovering their penises exists.

Walks away kickin' rocks.

Seriously. I agree with you partially, women and men are very different from one another, and we don't know every that makes the other tick, but you don't agree that men are visual by nature?

DSTCHAOS · #3 05-07-2008, 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PrettyBoy

Walks away kickin' rocks.

Seriously. I agree with you partially, women and men are very different from one another, and we don't know every that makes the other tick, but you don't agree that men are visual by nature?

Not "very different" but there are some differences. If you created a list of differences between men and women, I would erase most of them. I think you missed the sarcasm in my post.

And where the differences come from (inherent vs. social) is what most people are confused about.

I hope this part of your post is rhetorical.

PrettyBoy · #4 05-07-2008, 09:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DSTCHAOS

I hope this part of your post is rhetorical.

No, it wasn't.

DSTCHAOS · #5 05-07-2008, 09:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PrettyBoy

No, it wasn't.

Did you read my post?

tld221 · #6 05-07-2008, 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PrettyBoy

Walks away kickin' rocks.

Seriously. I agree with you partially, women and men are very different from one another, and we don't know every that makes the other tick, but you don't agree that men are visual by nature?

Sure men are visual, but the point was that we ALL are. it doesnt have to be a contest of who's more visual. A half-nekkid man should get similar response from a woman as a man should towards a half-nekkid woman. of course all parties being normal sexual beings and hetero...

DSTCHAOS · #7 05-07-2008, 09:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tld221

Sure men are visual, but the point was that we ALL are. it doesnt have to be a contest of who's more visual. A half-nekkid man should get similar response from a woman as a man should towards a half-nekkid woman. of course all parties being normal sexual beings and hetero...

Yes.

BTW, I'm lightweight "offended" that PrettyBoy missed the sarcasm in my post. Does he think that men are rational and instrumental and that women are emotional (and irrational) and expressive in what they do?

God bless.

BTW2, I have given people exercises on (race and) gender differences. I asked them to list what makes (racial groups and) men/women gender groupings different from each other. The responses are interesting and some of them were perceived biological differences between males and females, as well as social differences. But people confused the biological with the social.

tld221 · #8 05-07-2008, 09:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DSTCHAOS

Yes.

BTW, I'm lightweight "offended" that PrettyBoy missed the sarcasm in my post. Does he think that men are rational and instrumental and that women are emotional (and irrational) and expressive in what they do?

God bless.

BTW2, I have given people exercises on (race and) gender differences. I asked them to list what makes (racial groups and) men/women gender groupings different from each other. The responses are interesting and some of them were perceived biological differences between males and females, as well as social differences. But people confused the biological with the social.

that's what i was getting at in my head... i havent read the whole thread but im sure this has been pointed out. sex DNE gender. and i really hope PB doesnt think that "most men" are visual and that he is the exception to the "rule" by needing more than that. bah, whatever, at some point we ALL need those things. no one person (man or woman) can go on just on visual attraction.

PrettyBoy · #9 05-08-2008, 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tld221

that's what i was getting at in my head... i havent read the whole thread but im sure this has been pointed out. sex DNE gender. and i really hope PB doesnt think that "most men" are visual and that he is the exception to the "rule" by needing more than that. bah, whatever, at some point we ALL need those things. no one person (man or woman) can go on just on visual attraction.

tld221, I'm not saying I'm the exception to the rule. I'm just saying that some men including me must have a serious monogamous relationship with only one woman. Yes I am visual. Very visual, but at the same time, I want commitment with only one woman. Some men like looking at different body parts on women. For me it's her legs and her feet. I'm sure you all have seen my posts on that. This is important to me. I literally will not get in a relationship with a woman if she's physically lacking in the leg and feet area. She can have a great personality, a pretty face and a bangin' body, but if her feet are jacked, I'll let her know that we can just be friends or associates. I know that's shallow, but it's what I like and a must have in order for me to get involved with her. I am very visual, so I'm not singling myself out at all. You have to go back and read the whole post. I mentioned that some men are like me with the spiritual and emotional connection, but we're still visual.

PrettyBoy · #10 05-08-2008, 06:50 PM

Ladies, I understand you are visual, but men are more visual. In a relationship, I think that both men and women must accept the fact that we're different, and those differences will never change. We have to understand those differences and dwell together according to knowledge. I don't know what makes women tick, but I think it's important in any serious relationship to try and meet as many of each others needs (physically and emotionally) that we possibly can with the resources that we have.

DaemonSeid · #11 05-08-2008, 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PrettyBoy

tld221, I'm not saying I'm the exception to the rule. I'm just saying that some men including me must have a serious monogamous relationship with only one woman. Yes I am visual. Very visual, but at the same time, I want commitment with only one woman. Some men like looking at different body parts on women. For me it's her legs and her feet. I'm sure you all have seen my posts on that. This is important to me. I literally will not get in a relationship with a woman if she's physically lacking in the leg and feet area. She can have a great personality, a pretty face and a bangin' body, but if her feet are jacked, I'll let her know that we can just be friends or associates. I know that's shallow, but it's what I like and a must have in order for me to get involved with her. I am very visual, so I'm not singling myself out at all. You have to go back and read the whole post. I mentioned that some men are like me with the spiritual and emotional connection, but we're still visual.

aight so say if ere'thing is a 10...and she got a corn on her toes...then what

tld221 · #12 05-08-2008, 07:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PrettyBoy

I literally will not get in a relationship with a woman if she's physically lacking in the leg and feet area.

darn, too bad for all those hot amputees. they never stood a chance huh?

Quote:

Originally Posted by PrettyBoy

You have to go back and read the whole post. I mentioned that some men are like me with the spiritual and emotional connection, but we're still visual.

i do real all your posts actually, jarring bold, italic darkred text and all.

but honestly the takeaway was "i know everything about how men operate: were visual, and way more than women!"

what are you really trying to convince us of?

PrettyBoy · #13 05-08-2008, 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DSTCHAOS

ETA: With exception for individual variation, all humans have the potential to be turned on by nudity. And, no, men are not turned on by ANY female nudity. Men are picky. To believe that they (including YOU) are not is to assume something about biological maleness that has yet to proven true. And reduces grown ass men to 1 year olds who are just discovering their penises exists.

I saw this before I went to work, but I didn't have time to respond to it. LMAO! I was thinking about this all day today at work. We had a meeting and someone told a corny joke, and I was laughing the hardest. It looked like I was laughing at the joke, but I was thinking about this post.

I should have clarified that better. Yes we are picky. I was saying the many shapes or forms as in how it's presented to us. Rather it be in a movie, t.v. magazines or whatever. But yes, some men are picky. I know I am. But, yeah I agree with you on that.

Damn, you are funnnneeeee. LOL.