Quote:
Originally Posted by DSTCHAOS
I think that everyone understands the concept in theory.
We just don't understand why that is really a viable alternative for those members who truly value the rich histories, traditions, and practices that exist because of our (inter)national affiliations. And, of course, we're attempting to see this from the standpoint of the types of organizations where this sort of thing is more likely to apply.
Plus, the position was that this would be an increased occurrence (for IFC fraternities, I guess) and that's where the "discussion" really comes in.
|
Cannot agree with you more.
Todays kids that go to college are pretty smart and I think they would tend to go with tradition fof a National Fraternity for the future and what it could mean for them.
In pledgeing an off shoot or rouge GLO, what does one have? Just that small group, not the net work of a National and all of the GLOs who are out there in the real after graduation world.
National HQs do not make the regulations and rules, the membership does.
If a certain chapter does not want to abide by them, then try to change them. The Nationals run the daily business within the rules laid out to them.
If those rules are broken, they do make the decision to suspend or put on probation.
Hybrid Mode
