Your thoughts on AI: discussion goes here.

[ReachTheLimit]

Originally Posted by sigmadiva

The problem is that it becomes the burden of the GLO to prove the false statements wrong. When you have an initiated member, who represents the GLO, then the statements that the initiated member makes can be viewed as GLO policy, if the person receiving the information does not know any different.

btw, it has happend. Just go over to the Risk Management forum.

I don't want to research the forum. If a case exists then someone should post the details.

[sigmadiva]

Originally Posted by ReachTheLimit

I don't want to research the forum. If a case exists then someone should post the details.

I'm not going to do your work for you. If you really want to know that bad, look it up yourself.

[ReachTheLimit]

Originally Posted by sigmadiva

I'm not going to do your work for you. If you really want to know that bad, look it up yourself.

If it existed, you would be able to post it. I appreciate your attempt at maintaining the urban myth.

[sigmadiva]

Originally Posted by ReachTheLimit

If it existed, you would be able to post it. I appreciate your attempt at maintaining the urban myth.

I'm not going to post the dirty laundry of other orgs. I know some, I'm just being respectful of that org. I've got some dirty laundry in mine, so I'm not going to 'out' another org. It's called respect.