Your thoughts on AI: discussion goes here.

[33girl]

Originally Posted by valkyrie

I think that most college-educated women can figure out how to behave without a "code of online behavior" from their sororities. Those who can't can be dealt with, but there's no reason to treat the others like children.

Plus, I think it would be a real burden for the national HQs to reinforce it.

[Drolefille]

However, with in the age of Facebook and Myspace, it might be a good thing. It's not necessarily enforceable, particularly for alums, but I could see the webmaster position encompassing Facebook monitoring for example. It's often done for recruitment anyway. More anonymous sites are different, but I don't think it would be wrong for HQs to establish codes of online behavior.

I would assume it wouldn't be patronizing. It could be something along the lines of, "when representing your sorority" don't act like a jackass. Hmm.. not sure if it would work or not, but it's something that should be thought over at the very least.

/I'd call it the wave of the future, but that's just silly

[PinkandGreenJ]

Originally Posted by Drolefille

It could be something along the lines of, "when representing your sorority" don't act like a jackass.

I don't know about you, but I am sure Drolefile agrees as well, aren't we always representing ourselves and our sorority?

[ReachTheLimit]

Originally Posted by 33girl

Plus, I think it would be a real burden for the national HQs to reinforce it.

It's not their job to make sure it's enforced, it's the job of the members to report sisters who are in violation. From what I have read on Greek Chat, I see alot of talk about sisters getting reported for this, that, and the other, so why would AI discussion be any different IF the sorority had a policy on it?