This is a bit of a hijack, but it actually helps the WRCs, over time. Breaking quota into freshmen and sophomores means that the freshman quota is lower than a combined quota would be, so the SRCs get fewer freshmen and a few sophomores, rather than getting all freshmen, and leaving the sophomores to the WRCs, who then continue to struggle with numbers because they have women for three years instead of four.
So, in general, I think any campus with a decent number (say, more than 5% of PNM's) of sophomores/juniors rushing should do an upperclassman quota.
This is only relevant if the campus is one where subpar freshman > than excellent sophomore. On many campi this is not the case (thank God) and a freshman who is just "average" gets sent home from all the chapters to try again next year. As it should be, IMO.
__________________
It is all 33girl's fault. ~DrPhil
This is only relevant if the campus is one where subpar freshman > than excellent sophomore. On many campi this is not the case (thank God) and a freshman who is just "average" gets sent home from all the chapters to try again next year. As it should be, IMO.
Fair, but if you replace "sophomore" with "junior", you can, sadly, almost always say "mediocre freshman" > "excellent junior" if you have a 2-year live-in requirement.
Hybrid Mode
