Is hazing the best way?

[Drolefille]

Originally Posted by DrPhil

Did members of his organization not care enough to help him or did he not try?

Yeah...he explained those "unimportant details" that keep "sidetracking" GCers.

Oh no, I'm so offended. He appears to have exactly the amount of authority he claimed, and nothing more or less.

And I don't really care what he does with his organization, you do however appear to be the only one objecting to his inquiry here.

[DrPhil]

Originally Posted by Drolefille

Oh no, I'm so offended.

Yeah it's horrible that a transfer who was given the "authority" to handle this task is seeking advice on GC.

Originally Posted by Drolefille

you do however appear to be the only one objecting to his inquiry here.

Not really. But, to keep GC fun, threads don't have to go a certain way and GCers don't require a team in order to express an opinion. The best way for OPs not to receive a range of opinions is to not present the issue in the first place.

Originally Posted by Drolefille

And I don't really care what he does with his organization

Some care and others don't. As usual, I'm addressing a topic that has little to do specifically with the OP. We wouldn't have much discussion on GC if everything boiled down to "caring" about the OP himself/herself.

[ladygreek]

Originally Posted by Drolefille

And I don't really care what he does with his organization, you do however appear to be the only one objecting to his inquiry here.

Seriously? I had to go back and read the thread again. I saw more than one objection disguised as humorous or sarcastic remarks.

What I found disturbing is his disdain for the "unimportant details", which seemed very important to the original question. This thread may have taken a different course and been half as long if those details had been provided earlier (especially the one about his position.)

In any case it seems to me his question has been answered and re-answered. At this point I don't know what he is looking for unless it is for someone to detail their own Intake process. And if someone does that...

[Drolefille]

Originally Posted by ladygreek

Seriously? I had to go back and read the thread again. I saw more than one objection disguised as humorous or sarcastic remarks.

What I found disturbing is his disdain for the "unimportant details", which seemed very important to the original question. This thread may have taken a different course and been half as long if those details had been provided earlier (especially the one about his position.)

In any case it seems to me his question has been answered and re-answered. At this point I don't know what he is looking for unless it is for someone to detail their own Intake process. And if someone does that...

I agree that his question's been answered, and to be fair I only scrolled down through the posts that appeared under the reply box, so my own laziness I suppose.

I just find it to be overkill.

[DrPhil]

Originally Posted by Drolefille

I agree that his question's been answered, and to be fair I only scrolled down through the posts that appeared under the reply box, so my own laziness I suppose.

I just find it to be overkill.

Interesting.