New SCOTUS nominee

[Drolefille]

Originally Posted by Psi U MC Vito

You don't need judicial experience to know if something is against the Constitution or not. And I honestly think the SG is a better choice then a lower court judge for SCOTUS anyway. And people consider this. Obama probably based his decision for her for both SG and SCOTUS on his first hand knowledge of her. So are you telling me that the opinion of a legitimate Constitutional scholar isn't good enough for you? Not aimed at you Drolefille BTW.

It's cool.

And AGDee, isn't it exhausting?

[AGDee]

Originally Posted by Drolefille

It's cool.

And AGDee, isn't it exhausting?

I'm not sure why I bother...lol. Oh yeah, it beats writing a paper for my cryptography class.

[Drolefille]

Originally Posted by AGDee

I'm not sure why I bother...lol. Oh yeah, it beats writing a paper for my cryptography class.

Hehe. I note that our original "she's obviously gay" person can't defend herself either.

It's like their assumptions are being challenged and they're finding out they're baseless!

[DrPhil]

Originally Posted by Drolefille

Hehe. I note that our original "she's obviously gay" person can't defend herself either.

It's like their assumptions are being challenged and they're finding out they're baseless!

Because this is when people claim they are above the argumentative, childish, and snarky antics of the GC regulars.

[Drolefille]

Originally Posted by DrPhil

Because this is when people claim they are above the argumentative, childish, and snarky antics of the GC regulars.

Followed by the ~*Flounce*~