Quote:
Originally Posted by gatordeltapgh
I think it is a good change because quota is based on the amount of women actually signing their MRABA and completing the process. The old system did not take into account women dropping out at the last minute. Now you can take a look at how many women match and how many chapters make quota at each number in the quota range and pick the number that has the best outcome. Once quota has been determined quota additions can be used to place additional women who completed the process in good faith with chapters that did the same.
I think that RFM campuses are the most successful because they have a partner working with them every step of the way who can react to sudden changed in retention.
Of course the old method is much easier!  |
Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't it also take into account the Chapters last 3 years and what they did statistically? We have been using RFM on our campus for several years and the biggest thing I have seen is the Chapters being more alike in size then they used to be. I'm also finding much more well balanced new member classes (although that may not be a function of RFM) The other positive I find from RFM is it seems like a lot more women are place both through the recruitment process and quota additions.
Threaded Mode
