» GC Stats |
Members: 329,746
Threads: 115,668
Posts: 2,205,138
|
Welcome to our newest member, AlfredEmpom |
|
 |
|

07-10-2009, 06:42 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,730
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevlar281
I know right. I can't believe there is not one white kid attending that camp.
|
If there isn't, is that racism in your mind?
|

07-10-2009, 06:50 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 1,452
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrPhil
If there isn't, is that racism in your mind?
|
It was a joke. This is what I consider racist.
|

07-10-2009, 08:05 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: California
Posts: 1,808
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevlar281
It was a joke. This is what I consider racist.
|
Wow...just wow. I hope the kids who did it get caught.
__________________
Adam and Eve were lucky, neither had a mother-in-law.
|

07-10-2009, 09:21 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,730
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevlar281
It was a joke. This is what I consider racist.
|
Congratulations on finding white victims of a perceived hate crime. Your point?
|

07-10-2009, 09:27 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 14,146
|
|
HUNTINGDON VALLEY, Pa. The head of a private suburban Philadelphia swim club on Friday defended its cancellation of the memberships of dozens of minority children, saying safety, not racism, was the reason.
"We deeply regret this whole situation," John Duesler, president of the board of directors of The Valley Club, told reporters Friday afternoon at the entrance to the club in the leafy suburb of Huntingdon Valley.
[ full story ]
Nice attempt at spinning this, I guess.
__________________
*does side bends and sit-ups*
*doesn't lose butt*
|

07-10-2009, 10:02 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,730
|
|
Back to the topic....
Quote:
Originally Posted by knight_shadow
HUNTINGDON VALLEY, Pa. – The head of a private suburban Philadelphia swim club on Friday defended its cancellation of the memberships of dozens of minority children, saying safety, not racism, was the reason.
"We deeply regret this whole situation," John Duesler, president of the board of directors of The Valley Club, told reporters Friday afternoon at the entrance to the club in the leafy suburb of Huntingdon Valley.
[ full story ]
Nice attempt at spinning this, I guess.
|
I understand and can relate to both sides of the issue. But I think unfamiliarity and unwillingness to share (based on social class and race) are what breeded the contempt. Safety is just a more PC catch word.
I hope this situation is handled somehow and this relatively uninteresting story dies down.
Last edited by DrPhil; 07-10-2009 at 10:07 PM.
|

07-10-2009, 10:43 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: New England
Posts: 9,328
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrPhil
Other than that, this story doesn't move me.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrPhil
this relatively uninteresting story
|
Haha, don't hold back, tell us how you really feel.
|

07-10-2009, 10:41 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: New England
Posts: 9,328
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by knight_shadow
Nice attempt at spinning this, I guess.
|
They should either hire a competent PR person, or at least put a gag order on this guy.
|

07-11-2009, 11:15 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: At my new favorite writing spot.
Posts: 2,239
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by knight_shadow
HUNTINGDON VALLEY, Pa. – The head of a private suburban Philadelphia swim club on Friday defended its cancellation of the memberships of dozens of minority children, saying safety, not racism, was the reason.
"We deeply regret this whole situation," John Duesler, president of the board of directors of The Valley Club, told reporters Friday afternoon at the entrance to the club in the leafy suburb of Huntingdon Valley.
[ full story ]
Nice attempt at spinning this, I guess.
|
A friend and I were discussing this and one of the questions we had was if any other camps had visited before hand. I will have to forward this article.
Also @Phil I suppose it is ok to be blase about this story, but these are real children who are being affected by what they perceive to be racism and/or classism (whether that perception is accurate or not). Though I guess we can all agree, based on available information, that even if the club owner's response was not motivated by race, the responses of some of the patrons were. Note the children's response to their, to use Morrison's term, "disallowing." That is always noteworthy.
__________________
You think you know. But you have no idea.
Last edited by Little32; 07-11-2009 at 11:41 AM.
|

07-11-2009, 02:57 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,730
|
|
This is a relatively uninteresting and nongroundbreaking story to me, so are the reactions to this incident that I've heard elsewhere. A lot of people (not here but elsewhere) are very outraged, not because these are kids but because people are easily outraged over race relations.
My apathy toward the story as reported and people's responses is separate from the social significance of the alleged incident and how it should be handled.
|

07-11-2009, 04:03 PM
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hotel Oceanview
Posts: 34,519
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by knight_shadow
HUNTINGDON VALLEY, Pa. The head of a private suburban Philadelphia swim club on Friday defended its cancellation of the memberships of dozens of minority children, saying safety, not racism, was the reason.
|
I think that saying they cancelled their "memberships" is a bit over the top and improper spin by the AP. Membership in a private club is something individuals apply for. These children were being permitted to swim there for the summer ONLY - on Mondays ONLY - because of an agreement a camp they were attending made with the club. It was more like having a day pass.
Not that I don't think the whole thing is ridiculous and racist, but the appropriate terminology should be used. Implying these children were "members" inflames the situation further.
__________________
It is all 33girl's fault. ~DrPhil
|

07-13-2009, 01:45 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Occupied Territory CSA
Posts: 2,237
|
|
While I completely disagree with the racism on all fronts:
I hope the pool's decision is not struck down by the courts. It is a private institution that receives no tax dollars. It should "theoretically" be able to serve whoever it wants. The consumer (both white and black) can act in response to this. But it is a private institution and the government should not be able to have any say in whom it serves. Whether that will happen or not is another case. (And it won't.)
__________________
Overall, though, it's the bigness of the car that counts the most. Because when something bad happens in a really big car accidentally speeding through the middle of a gang of unruly young people who have been taunting you in a drive-in restaurant, for instance it happens very far away way out at the end of your fenders. It's like a civil war in Africa; you know, it doesn't really concern you too much. - P.J. O'Rourke
|

07-13-2009, 02:43 PM
|
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Posts: 18,668
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elephant Walk
While I completely disagree with the racism on all fronts:
I hope the pool's decision is not struck down by the courts. It is a private institution that receives no tax dollars. It should "theoretically" be able to serve whoever it wants. The consumer (both white and black) can act in response to this. But it is a private institution and the government should not be able to have any say in whom it serves. Whether that will happen or not is another case. (And it won't.)
|
I agree with that. Even the restaurant in the notorious Katzenbach v. McClung case (where the SCOTUS said that racial discrimination in places of public accommodation was a burden on interstate commerce) was able to avoid the effect of the court's pronouncement by becoming a private club which only admitted whites.
I'd think though that business would be pretty bad for a club openly discriminating against blacks. No one wants to be associated with that. That's probably part of why the private club has done a 180 on its decision. No doubt many members cancelled their memberships over this incident and would continue to do so until something was done (I would).
__________________
SN -SINCE 1869-
"EXCELLING WITH HONOR"
S N E T T
Mu Tau 5, Central Oklahoma
|

07-13-2009, 02:52 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: In a house.
Posts: 9,564
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin
I'd think though that business would be pretty bad for a club openly discriminating against blacks. No one wants to be associated with that. That's probably part of why the private club has done a 180 on its decision. No doubt many members cancelled their memberships over this incident and would continue to do so until something was done (I would).
|
This almost goes back to what I was saying earlier. What institution in their right mind in today's society would allow archaic rules like this to be set in place, whether written or not?
Yes, to a degree they may have a 'right' to serve whomever they want, but all the same, it's outdated thinking that is perpetuated because the people involved let it be so.
What becomes interesting is not the color of people who are or aren't allowed to utilize the facility, it's the color of what keeps this place open.
Green.
To a point, one can say that the club didn't want to be seen as racist, thus the quick 180 as you mentioned.
Furthermore, being seen as such could also open the club for retaliation such as...lawsuits which could affect their bottom line should they lose their case or once people catch wind that they are being dragged into court because of this type of thinking.
I won't assume that's what going on but, in today's society when shyte like this occurs, you don't have to always protest, just threaten a person's pockets.
__________________
Law and Order: Gotham - In the Criminal Justice System of Gotham City the people are represented by three separate, yet equally important groups. The police who investigate crime, the District Attorneys who prosecute the offenders, and the Batman. These are their stories.
|

07-13-2009, 03:43 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,033
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin
I'd think though that business would be pretty bad for a club openly discriminating against blacks. No one wants to be associated with that.
|
You don't actually believe that do you? If that really was the case, do you really think there would still be all-white country clubs and other private clubs? That really is a rather naive sentiment you have expressed there. Business doesn't always flounder for businesses that discriminate against blacks. And there are people who don't mind being associated with that. Billy Graham was a member of an all-white country club for years. Clearly he had no problem with it.
__________________
Just because I don't agree with it doesn't mean I'm afraid of it.
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|