Quote:
Originally Posted by KSig RC
And your own statement gives a perfectly valid reason why I think it's somewhat exaggerated, and likely not fit as evidence of conspiracy - she's not credible, in a sense, because there is motivation to appear a certain way.
That's about the farthest thing from proof (of any sort) that her child is anything but her own. She's provided birth records. Seriously.
|
No my statement is not a valid reason for you to think it is exaggerated.
I notice people always make this argument when something utterly ridiculous is revealed about someone and they can't accept it. When I say there is motivation to appear a certain way...there is. She has made it clear that she wants to let people know how dedicated she is and she offered up the fact that she went back to work three days after giving birth as proof of that. And while I applaud all working mothers, especially if they are in such high profile positions, I know that I'm not alone in questioning her judgment in going back to work so soon after giving birth to a baby with DS and choosing to fly on a plane for 8 hours while in labor. I'm sorry if you can't wrap your mind around it, but your decision to remain in denial does not make this any less true.
On another note, from what I understand she never actually provided a birth record for Trig. In fact I think there was also an issue because she did not provide any medical records indicating that she had actually given birth around the time that Trig was actually born.
Threaded Mode
