GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > General Chat Topics > News & Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

» GC Stats
Members: 331,995
Threads: 115,727
Posts: 2,208,054
Welcome to our newest member, zcharlesshlzez5
» Online Users: 5,545
1 members and 5,544 guests
FSUZeta
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-11-2008, 03:44 PM
DrPhil DrPhil is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,733
Quote:
Originally Posted by KSig RC View Post
All of this sort of research is subject to so many assumptions that it wouldn't be too hard to meet a 95% confidence interval supporting whatever hypothesis you set out to prove - I will say that it doesn't pass a "smell test" for me to simply claim that the entirety of the disparity in sentencing between whites and blacks is based on socioeconomic factors, though, and I'm quite suspicious of research that claims that as its analysis.
After controlling for other factors, socioeconomic factors may be found to be the most salient. However, any good research will acknowledge the strengths and weaknesses of the analysis so none of these findings should be taken in isolation from one another.

Unfortunately, policies and programs are often based on literal interpretations of research findings and the effectiveness of the policies and programs are assumed rather than tested.

Quote:
Originally Posted by KSig RC View Post
The issue, then, becomes whether the 'best' way to approach the problem (again, hypothetically) requires addressing the underlying factors or the agents - to me, it seems that a top-down approach attacking the underlying factors will naturally lead to change in the agents, but a.) that's a decidedly long-term solution that may not be practical and b.) it's quite pie-in-the-sky. With those caveats and to get back to preciousjeni's question, I'll guess it's not too likely that many decision makers stand up and say "hey, we're on the wrong path here when it comes to the legal or criminal justice systems" - at least not immediately - and that this shouldn't be expected until there's more awareness of the underlying factors involved.
It isn't either/or to me. We need top-down and bottom-up approaches. It will take years to fully address disparities in factors like family attachment, education, and socioeconomic status. While we're working on that, we have too many poor people, minorities, and juvenile delinquents in the court and corrections systems without hope for rehabilitation or support mechanisms. This perpetuates a cycle of social disparity and violence that needs to be addressed. There's no point in improving education and other structural and cultural factors if there will be thousands of people released from facilities, and their family, who will have have difficulty adjusting to these improvements.

I am excited to be aware of the research on this and the outreach efforts that take a hands-on approach. There's a lot of stuff going on, even if the improvements are slow and seem to be falling on deaf ears.

Last edited by DrPhil; 11-11-2008 at 03:46 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Steve Urkell dead? Is it true....I hope not. UKDaisy Entertainment 10 06-16-2006 11:46 AM
Evolution of Dance alum Chit Chat 1 06-04-2006 05:37 PM
UNderworld Evolution Highm8ness1 Delta Sigma Theta 2 01-30-2006 03:14 PM
Evolution? Tom Earp Chit Chat 8 06-06-2003 10:01 AM
Evolution--The Movie cash78mere Entertainment 7 07-07-2001 07:55 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.