Quote:
Originally Posted by MysticCat
I think there is (or can be) a moral difference.
If we start from the assumption that both candidates are on the balance reasonably-equally qualified, I think there is a moral/ethical difference between
1) A white voter whose vote for the white candidate is prompted by the belief that a white will always make a better president than a black, or that he doesn't want to see a black president; and
2) A black voter whose vote for the black candidate is prompted not by the belief that a black will always make a better president than a white, but by the belief that the time is right to bring a perspective into the Oval Office that hasn't been there before and to move America a little further down the road.
It seems to me that the former is a refutation of the promise inherent in the Declaration of Independence ("that all men are created equal"), while the latter is an attempt to claim that promise.
|
I agree and this goes back to the different dynamics beyond the surface level. You're just coolererer than I am.
I don't think this is a basic moral argument so even this would be too deep to counter the shallow assertion of the "moral equivalent." I see the moral equivalent as being about "what good people do versus bad people do...good people wouldn't make a negative OR positive judgment with race as a factor."
Hybrid Mode
