"I love you but I am not IN LOVE with you."

[PrettyBoy]

Originally Posted by DaemonSeid

If you dated someone for a few months or years and you told them that you loved them and that was the response...what would you do?

I would tell her that she is in lust not in love.

[I.A.S.K.]

Originally Posted by PrettyBoy

I would tell her that she is in lust not in love.

You lost me on that one.

[PrettyBoy]

Originally Posted by I.A.S.K.

You lost me on that one.

A few months is too early.

[I.A.S.K.]

Originally Posted by PrettyBoy

A few months is too early.

Oh, I thought something like:

You: I'm in love with you
Her: I love you, but Im not in love with you
You: You're in lust not love



but you meant:
Her: Im in love with you
You: You're not in love you're in lust because its only been a few months.

I get it now. Not sure if I agree, but I get it.

[Senusret I]

Originally Posted by I.A.S.K.

but you meant:
Her: Im in love with you
You: You're not in love you're in lust because its only been a few months.

That's stupid and arrogant. You can't tell someone else how they feel, just tell them how you feel.

Not mad @ you, IASK, just mad at stupid ass statements like that.

[I.A.S.K.]

Originally Posted by Senusret I

That's stupid and arrogant. You can't tell someone else how they feel, just tell them how you feel.

Not mad @ you, IASK, just mad at stupid ass statements like that.

Thanks for not being mad at me. Im too lurvley for people to be mad at. lol.

I agree with you, that statement is stupid and arrogant in the worst way. If some man told me that I'd go off. I do understand being skeptical of whether someone is being real after only a few months, but I would not degrade someone's feelings by telling them "You're not in love you're in lust". Thats why I had to clarify PB's comment.

[PrettyBoy]

Originally Posted by I.A.S.K.

Thanks for not being mad at me. Im too lurvley for people to be mad at. lol.

I agree with you that statement is stupid and arrogant in the worst way. If some man told me that I'd go off. I do understand being skeptical of whether someone is being real after only a few months, but I would not degrade someone's feelings by telling them "You're not in love you're in lust". Thats why I had to clarify PB's comment.

I.A.S.K. I respect your opinion and you're entitled to it, but after only a few months you don't really know him. It's important to know how that person is under stress/pressure, how that person is with money etc. Just getting to know that person takes time. But if you think it's possible I won't say you're wrong, because it is possible for something like that to happen.

[PrettyBoy]

Originally Posted by I.A.S.K.

but you meant:
Her: Im in love with you
You: You're not in love you're in lust because its only been a few months.

I get it now. Not sure if I agree, but I get it.

Yup, that's what I meant. I'm sure it can and has happened, but I would feel that it was too early.

[DaemonSeid]

Originally Posted by PrettyBoy

Yup, that's what I meant. I'm sure it can and has happened, but I would feel that it was too early.

Or do you mean that she is in love with the 'stick'....yeah....that's it....heh!

[cheerfulgreek]

I don't put a time on my feelings especially when it comes to my feelings for someone else.

lol @ Daemon's post.

[PrettyBoy]

Originally Posted by DaemonSeid

Or do you mean that she is in love with the 'stick'....yeah....that's it....heh!

Dead.