
09-26-2007, 01:50 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 232
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MysticCat
As has been noted, there have been men who have talked to the press, but have not gone public. This is DC after all, and it's not inconceivable that any men in question have their own reasons for not wanting to go public.
As for being "set up," I just don't buy that. The bait may have been offered, but nobody forced him to bite.
The man pled guilty, not nolo contendere. I don't know about Minnesota, but where I am, that's not just a simple matter of saying "okay, I'll plead guilty to get this overwith, see you later." The judge questions you pretty specifically with questions designed to make sure you understand the implications of pleading guilty. The judge also has to find that there is, in fact, a factual basis for believing that you are guilty, such as a statement from you that actually did what you have been accused of doing. These questions are designed to make sure that a defendant is receiving due process and is not being coerced into pleading guilty.
I'll be very, very surprised if he gets is allowed to withdraw that guilty plea at this point. I get the sense that he will be surprised as well.
|
I don't think he should be allowed to change his plea, unless they can prove that he didn't know what he was getting into.
__________________
Oh... you know.
|