GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > General Chat Topics > News & Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

» GC Stats
Members: 329,796
Threads: 115,673
Posts: 2,205,433
Welcome to our newest member, johnpetrovoz968
» Online Users: 2,943
3 members and 2,940 guests
amIblue?, Cookiez17
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-20-2007, 05:43 PM
DaemonSeid DaemonSeid is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: In a house.
Posts: 9,564
Quote:
Originally Posted by SydneyK View Post
I'm not saying this to in any way insinuate that the jury was "fair", but what could they have done? According to an earlier post, of the 50 or so people who showed up for jury duty, none of them were black. If it takes having black jurors in order to have a fair jury (in a case involving a black defendant), then why didn't any of the black people who were called for jury duty report? If none were called, then what's the option (I'm asking because I have no law experience, so I honestly don't know what a solution to this problem could've been)? In a town of 2800 people, only 12% of whom are black, it's not hard to see how the jury could easily be all white.
Sidney....good point......here is my question too, if that was an issue...then why didn't they change the venue? (rhetorical question BTW)


Scott Peterson got that option if I remember...and all he did was kill his pregnant wife and colored his hair.
__________________
Law and Order: Gotham - “In the Criminal Justice System of Gotham City the people are represented by three separate, yet equally important groups. The police who investigate crime, the District Attorneys who prosecute the offenders, and the Batman. These are their stories.”
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-20-2007, 05:57 PM
SydneyK SydneyK is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,952
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaemonSeid View Post
if that was an issue...then why didn't they change the venue? (rhetorical question BTW)
I realize it's a rhetorical question, but it's one that merits an answer. I'd honestly like to know why that didn't happen (assuming, of course, it is a viable option).
__________________
Never let the facts stand in the way of a good answer. -Tom Magliozzi
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-20-2007, 06:07 PM
Kevin Kevin is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Posts: 18,669
Quote:
Originally Posted by SydneyK View Post
I realize it's a rhetorical question, but it's one that merits an answer. I'd honestly like to know why that didn't happen (assuming, of course, it is a viable option).
I'm guessing because no one asked for a change of venue? I suppose the court could have raised the issue sua sponte. I could see a good case for that. Again though, a P.D. would probably only do that if he thought his client had a snowball's chance at an acquittal. Considering the number of witnesses for the state (which would make it an expensive case to do somewhere else), the fact that there was probably a lot of media coverage all over the state, etc., it'd be pretty hard to find another venue which wasn't plagued by all of the same problems of exposure.

At any rate, the kids are guilty as hell. The only real question should be punishment.
__________________
SN -SINCE 1869-
"EXCELLING WITH HONOR"
S N E T T
Mu Tau 5, Central Oklahoma
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Jena Six GoldnBlue2004 Alpha Phi Alpha 5 08-29-2007 10:32 PM
Jena Six Case GoldnBlue2004 Iota Phi Theta 0 08-23-2007 10:52 AM
Jena Six Case GoldnBlue2004 Zeta Phi Beta 0 08-23-2007 10:52 AM
Jena Six Case GoldnBlue2004 Gamma Sigma Sigma 0 08-23-2007 10:51 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.