Quote:
Originally Posted by lauroo615
I respect your opinion, and I appreciate your reply!
However, only one organization is truly under total, the rest are flourishing. Even this group has an incredibly large spring class, and therefore has grown significantly from the fall. Spring recruitment overall went extraordinarly well, except for the roughly 50 women who did not find homes.
Not including these ~50 women, our interest group includes 55 women. I'm definitely not positive on this, but I believe total at Appalachian is 80 women.
Class time!
|
Were the new release figures used?
I don't think I'm understanding so I'll ask
Okay are you saying that if you counted the 50 women who didn't bid match and the 55 in your interest group, that over 100 women haven't "found their home"?
I guess it doesn't make sense
to me (emphasis on to me, I'm not understanding it) to include the interest group number unless every woman in the interest group has gone through formal with an open mind and didn't bid match. In that case, yeah no home was found.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by irishpipes
I disagree. While I don't have an opinion about App State, this reasoning hasn't played out historically. Sometimes one or more chapters are below total and/or do not take quota because of an image problem, and fair or not, PNMs have decided they would rather not be Greek than join that chapter. They might very well consider a new, untainted chapter. Like I said, I have no idea what the situation is at App State, but some chapters just won't ever become stronger, no matter what Panhellenic does.
|
Great point! Didn't think of it that way. So very true!
Threaded Mode
