|
» GC Stats |
Members: 331,558
Threads: 115,712
Posts: 2,207,717
|
| Welcome to our newest member, zajacksonfranes |
|
 |
|

01-24-2007, 12:11 AM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,036
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DSTCHAOS
The irony of this announcement is overwhelming.
|
Well lets see.....I think 7 is a pretty damn good amount for head coaches. I'm not even taking into consideration the amount of black assistants....have you looked on the sidelines during NFL games? I see a huge amount of black linebacker coaches, running back coaches, wide receiver coaches, defensive line coaches, secondary coaches, etc. About the only positions you see white guys even doing anymore is QBs, offensive linemen, and special teams.
Now lets consider who is coaching right now. Mike Shannahan, Mike Holmgren, Joe Gibbs, Brian Billichick, Marty Schottenheimer, Bill Cowher....these are hall of fame coaches........they will always have a head coaching job as long as they want to coach. So that leaves you with 28 teams out of 32 that could have a possibility of having a coaching vacancy. Lovie Smith, Tony Dungy, Herman Edwards, these three black coaches are going to be around for a while as well. John Gruden, Andy Reid, Sean Payton, Brian Billick, Eric Mangini.......they aren't going anywhere either........so that leaves around 23 teams, give or take, that could possibly shuffle coaches year in and year out. Sorry......I just find it extremely difficult to make sure you absolutely have the most qualified 23 men out of hundreds of applicants......white or black.
.......or maybe I just went on a rant for no reason and should realize that the only way black people will be satisfied is when all 32 head coaches, every player, every coordinator, and every assistant is black.
|

01-24-2007, 12:24 AM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Mile High America
Posts: 17,088
|
|
|
__________________
Fraternally,
DeltAlum
DTD
The above is the opinion of the poster which may or may not be based in known facts and does not necessarily reflect the views of Delta Tau Delta or Greek Chat -- but it might.
|

01-24-2007, 08:04 AM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 22,590
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeltAlum
|
 I know the author of this article and his wife!
__________________
I am a woman, I make mistakes. I make them often. God has given me a talent and that's it. ~ Jill Scott
|

01-24-2007, 09:55 AM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,255
|
|
|
We're not ignoring history, but there comes a point, at least in my mind, where things have evened out. I don't think coaches have been hired based on skin color in quite a while, and I think the only reason its taken this long is that past lack of opportunity meant a smaller pool of black coaches. However, I think for the most part things have caught up. I do think the ownership complaint is ridiculous.
|

01-24-2007, 10:21 AM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 578
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shinerbock
However, I think for the most part things have caught up. I do think the ownership complaint is ridiculous.
|
WHy do you say "for the most part" then?
Quote:
Originally Posted by shinerbock
I still think it is a double standard. If I cheer for a white receiver, because he's white, people are gonna look at me funny.
|
Well, seeing as how there is not history in this situation that would justify your cheering other than the same justification whites have given for supporting whites just because they are white forever in America, then yeah you should be looked at funny.
-And I can't believe you and your bosom buddy are acting like things are so color blind now. You KNOW the race of the man is considered when thinking about hiring them, whether they are making one statement or another. YOU all are the ones who are being unrealistic when you say or even think (and I'm sure you're forcing yourself to think this way) that those people who look at a group of individuals and have to consider who to hire don't look at the fact the one is black and one is white. Whether they utilize those thoughts to decide to hire or refrain from hiring is what no one knows, but the thoughts are most certainly there, I'm sure, and I would not doubt too seriously that they aren't jumping at the chance to pick the black man over the white one. If they do, then I think there was some internal (meaning within themselves) or external pressure to do so, which is sad.
Last edited by Phasad1913; 01-24-2007 at 10:25 AM.
|

01-24-2007, 10:29 AM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Somewhere trying to avoid pointless political conversations...Obama/Biden 08!
Posts: 318
|
|
Well I for one am proud of the fact that there are two black coaches going to the Superbowl.
__________________
We made history tonight! Obama is the new President, now what!! 
|

01-24-2007, 12:08 PM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,255
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phasad1913
WHy do you say "for the most part" then?
Well, seeing as how there is not history in this situation that would justify your cheering other than the same justification whites have given for supporting whites just because they are white forever in America, then yeah you should be looked at funny.
-And I can't believe you and your bosom buddy are acting like things are so color blind now. You KNOW the race of the man is considered when thinking about hiring them, whether they are making one statement or another. YOU all are the ones who are being unrealistic when you say or even think (and I'm sure you're forcing yourself to think this way) that those people who look at a group of individuals and have to consider who to hire don't look at the fact the one is black and one is white. Whether they utilize those thoughts to decide to hire or refrain from hiring is what no one knows, but the thoughts are most certainly there, I'm sure, and I would not doubt too seriously that they aren't jumping at the chance to pick the black man over the white one. If they do, then I think there was some internal (meaning within themselves) or external pressure to do so, which is sad.
|
I think it has caught up, but I leave my options open considering I don't know everything, and neither do you. I'm not gonna make some broad statement like "Nobody thinks about race anymore" even though I think that statement is likely true. How many good white receivers are there? Modern history shows white receivers don't do very well. Whats the difference in rooting for a white player because he's white, and rooting for a black person because they're black? I'm not talking about being happy for the two coaches, its been made rather clear that nobody has an issue with that. I do however think its ridiculous to root for someone because they're white/black. Thats where the double standard is. The fact is that its appropriate for black people to be proud of their race, but its not for white people. Putting history aside for a second, if I said "I'm proud, as a white person, to have Manning in the Super Bowl" people would think I'm a white supremacist. Now, to a degree I think this pride black people show in such things is appropriate, similar to how Irish and Italians were proud when one of their own made it to a significant post, etc...but siding with one race just because it is your own is something I think we need to get past in this country. Example? Duke rape case.
And Phasad, I don't think race is that big a deal in hiring. I think how you act is the key. Of course Goldman Sachs is going to be reluctant to hire somebody who although intelligent, dresses like a thug. Its not about race, its about how you present yourself. As a law student, firms absolutely eat up the black students who present themselves well.
|

01-24-2007, 04:15 PM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 578
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shinerbock
Putting history aside for a second, if I said "I'm proud, as a white person, to have Manning in the Super Bowl" people would think I'm a white supremacist.
|
Putting history aside for a second? You really can't do that because that is the premise for this entire discussion, Shiner. If history was capable of being "put aside" then, of course, it would be no difference between the sense of a need for pride in the black race as black people and that of whites in their race. That, however, isn't the case so hypothetically putting history aside doesn't do anything for the discussion which is not rooted in hypos but in reality.
Quote:
Originally Posted by shinerbock
Now, to a degree I think this pride black people show in such things is appropriate, similar to how Irish and Italians were proud when one of their own made it to a significant post, etc
|
Well, this IS the basis for how we feel so if you can understand the sentiment for Irish people and Italians, then you should understand ours. Again, I really think you're just making a specific effort NOT to understand where these sentiments come from when any person of a certain age or older and with any amount of knowledge about the world's/American history should and does know why the sentiments and sense of pride come from.
And Shinerbock, your willful reluctance to acknowledge the very REAL existence of consciousness of race in the inner-workings of every facet of this society is part of the problem in this country with working these things out. Every healing program on earth starts off by making their participants actully acknowledge that they have a problem. The society is no different. The changes that HAVE occured to date only occured because there were enough people that first acknowledged that there IS a problem and then undertook methods to fix it.
Last edited by Phasad1913; 01-24-2007 at 04:17 PM.
|

01-24-2007, 10:45 AM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,228
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrimsonTide4
 I know the author of this article and his wife! 
|
 I know them too!
__________________
1908 - 2008
A VERY SERIOUS MATTER.
|

01-24-2007, 10:52 AM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Looking for freedom in an unfree world...
Posts: 4,215
|
|
|
some background and data amidst the conjecture...
http://www.findjustice.com/nfl/indextext.html
"Black Coaches in the National Football League"
This report led to the creation of the NFL's current policy of inclusion of minority candidates in the interviewing processes of NFL clubs.
For the record, Frederick Douglass "Fritz" Pollard was named a head coach in 1921 in the APFA, which became the NFL a year later. Art Shell was the first African American head coach in the NFL's modern era (1989).
Both men are brothers of Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity, Inc.
__________________
For the Son of man came to seek and to save the lost.
~ Luke 19:10
|

01-24-2007, 11:26 AM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Down the street
Posts: 9,791
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyB06
For the record, Frederick Douglass "Fritz" Pollard was named a head coach in 1921 in the APFA, which became the NFL a year later. Art Shell was the first African American head coach in the NFL's modern era (1989).
|
Thanks for the clarification, which will lead shortsighted people to say "see, I told you people that there's no exclusion of black coaches."
Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyB06
Both men are brothers of Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity, Inc.
|
Is it possible that the Frederick Douglass that the Alphas list as an honorary is really "Fritz" Pollard?  Just kidding.
|

01-24-2007, 12:26 AM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Down the street
Posts: 9,791
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by macallan25
Well lets see.....I think 7 is a pretty damn good amount for head coaches.
|
Clearly, black people should be THANKFUL because this society is obviously doing US a favor when there are 7 black coaches.
Quote:
Originally Posted by macallan25
.......or maybe I just went on a rant for no reason and should realize that the only way black people will be satisfied is when all 32 head coaches, every player, every coordinator, and every assistant is black.
|
Yep...that's what such topics are all about. Black people want to take over the country and eventually the world. This NFL coach thingie is the tip of the iceburg. PREPARE FOR COMPLETE WORLD DOMINATION!!! Then we'll be "satisfied" and stop all of our whining.
|

01-24-2007, 12:33 AM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,255
|
|
|
DSTS, then what are you arguing for? Black people dominate pro sports, I don't see a battle to be fought here.
|

01-24-2007, 12:35 AM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Mile High America
Posts: 17,088
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shinerbock
DSTS, then what are you arguing for? Black people dominate pro sports, I don't see a battle to be fought here.
|
Except in the coaching ranks and front office.
__________________
Fraternally,
DeltAlum
DTD
The above is the opinion of the poster which may or may not be based in known facts and does not necessarily reflect the views of Delta Tau Delta or Greek Chat -- but it might.
|

01-24-2007, 12:38 AM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,036
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeltAlum
Except in the coaching ranks and front office.
|
Delt........then can you find me something that has the names of every coaching position in the NFL.........because i'd be willing to bet alot of money that there are, overall, more black coaches in the NFL than white ones. And by coaching I mean, position coaches, strength coaches, etc., etc.
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|