Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Earp
That is Earpspeak thank you! 
So now that everyone is so un worried about spelling, what about the origninal question?
So, Reagan won, and everyone thinks He was great, He played a very good role of President and was loved.
Kennedy was around in the Legislature and had daddys money behind him!
He, Clinton, Carter, IKE, were right for their times. Has not History proven differently at times?
One of the under deemed President material was the Vice President under FDR who died unexpectedly by the name of Harry Truman.
So, what does the Big O bring to the table? For that fact what does The Hillary bring to the table?  |
Someone could have issue with each one of these contentions. It takes quite a while to be able to judge a President's tenure, and there have been pretty fierce debates on the ability of Kennedy, Truman, and many others. It's just a very subjective judgment in most cases.
It's a bit too soon to start judging Clinton or even Reagan at this point.
Threaded Mode
