Obama Running for President.

[macallan25]

Originally Posted by Tom Earp

So, no concentious of oppinion on the OP?

So, no schooling?

[jon1856]

Originally Posted by macallan25

So, no schooling?

Tom;
PLEASE do what I did-down load the spell check plug in.
It was not working for awhile; have to guess that John renewed contract.

[shinerbock]

Is there a "grasping the english language" plug-in?

[AlexMack]

Originally Posted by shinerbock

Is there a "grasping the english language" plug-in?

Yes, but there isn't one for Earpese.

[Tom Earp]

That is Earpspeak thank you!

So now that everyone is so un worried about spelling, what about the origninal question?

So, Reagan won, and everyone thinks He was great, He played a very good role of President and was loved.

Kennedy was around in the Legislature and had daddys money behind him!

He, Clinton, Carter, IKE, were right for their times. Has not History proven differently at times?

One of the under deemed President material was the Vice President under FDR who died unexpectedly by the name of Harry Truman.

So, what does the Big O bring to the table? For that fact what does The Hillary bring to the table?

[MysticCat]

Originally Posted by Tom Earp

So, Reagan won, and everyone thinks He was great, He played a very good role of President and was loved.

Clinton [and] Carter . . . were right for their times. Has not History proven differently at times?

I know lots of people who would dispute these assertions and would say that history has proven or will prove differently with Carter, Reagan and Clinton.

[GeekyPenguin]

Originally Posted by MysticCat

I know lots of people who would dispute these assertions and would say that history has proven or will prove differently with Carter, Reagan and Clinton.

I was just about to say that in a not-so-eloquent or polite manner.

[KSigkid]

Originally Posted by Tom Earp

That is Earpspeak thank you!

So now that everyone is so un worried about spelling, what about the origninal question?

So, Reagan won, and everyone thinks He was great, He played a very good role of President and was loved.

Kennedy was around in the Legislature and had daddys money behind him!

He, Clinton, Carter, IKE, were right for their times. Has not History proven differently at times?

One of the under deemed President material was the Vice President under FDR who died unexpectedly by the name of Harry Truman.

So, what does the Big O bring to the table? For that fact what does The Hillary bring to the table?

Someone could have issue with each one of these contentions. It takes quite a while to be able to judge a President's tenure, and there have been pretty fierce debates on the ability of Kennedy, Truman, and many others. It's just a very subjective judgment in most cases.

It's a bit too soon to start judging Clinton or even Reagan at this point.

[shinerbock]

Reagan will be viewed fondly. Clinton will too, although in a schoolboy got-in-trouble-but-we-love-him kinda way. Carter will be viewed as a complete failure, because thats what he was. His recent actions certainly aren't helping.