Quote:
Originally Posted by PinkSkyAtNight
Here is the organization's statement on hazing, you can determine if separating PNMs and talking to some and not others creates an environment of superiority/inferiority:
Hazing is prohibited.
Hazing is any action taken or situation created, organized or conducted regardless of intent by any new and/or initiated member of XYZ or their agent(s) for any other individual where participation may be voluntary, forced or coerced that occurs, regardless of location, that has the potential to cause or actually results in emotional, mental or physical discomfort; illness; injury; consumption of or opportunity to consume alcohol; that may create a superior/inferior relationship between the participants; and/or may reflect unfavorably upon the individuals, chapter or Fraternity. Permission or approval by a person being hazed is not a defense.
Any chapter or individual member whose actions or attitudes are not in accord with the Fraternity’s policy against hazing will be subject to disciplinary action by the chapter and/or by Grand Council. Acts of hazing may result in civil and criminal liability on the part of those individuals engaged in such activities.
Chapters and members must follow all applicable federal, state, local and province laws and university policies regarding hazing.
The elimination of hazing is the responsibility of each collegiate and alumna member of XYZ.
|
This isn't your fight, it's not even your organization. This is a matter for UT Panhellenic, Nationals and maybe the NPC.
Honestly, butt out. I'd find it so odd to get a report of hazing from someone who isn't in the organization or even at UT. It's like stirring the pot.
If the system wants it to change, then the system will change it.
Threaded Mode
