Quote:
Originally Posted by EE-BO
The anecdotal and historical evidence is driven heavily by reports and accounts of pedophilia and rape of women.
|
Please cite credible or respected academic sources (note this doesn't include Communist Convent/Monastery fantasy novellas) that back up this claim - both Catholic and non-Catholic sources would be nice.
Quote:
More recently, how about Cardinal Bernard Law who was knowingly transferring a repeatedly complained about pedophilic priest who had attacked many children. It was known the guy was messing with kids, and Law just kept moving him around.
|
So singular cases and people prove a centuries long conspiracy? Citing singular sources in furtherance of a argument showing systemic abuse wouldn't net you a passing grade in most schools...
Quote:
How about the fact the Pope pulled him over to Europe and gave him a PROMOTION when Law had to get out of the US or face the ire of American Catholics?
|
Because the Pope exercised his prerogative under Canon Law to deal with the Cardinal "in-house"... and promotion doesn't always equal advancement or reward - particularlly if said promotion is effectively an exile.
Quote:
How are Law and our last Pope NOT somehow guilty for the facilitation of child molestation on this score alone?
|
Because again the exception doesn't prove the rule, no matter how much you wish it did - was Law a moron in trying to play the protector of the Church's rep? Yes. Did he make a colossal mistake in not treating the complaints credibly? Yes. Did he err in accepting the offender's repentance as credible, and forgiving them? Maybe...
But this hardly the image of the Cardinal and Pope sitting down and figuring out how to facilitate the abuse of children that you imply.
Quote:
If something like that can happen today, then it is no stretch to take all the evidence of times past and put together the pieces.
|
Yes it is a stretch jackass because disconnected singular incidents doesn't make a vast connected conspiracy of systemic child abuse...