Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin
They saw these six people who they knew from school attack their classmate savagely. How are they not credible? You're right -- eye witness accounts are historically some of the least accurate witnesses around. When you have a whole gaggle of them though, given the conditions, etc., I can't see how you could come to that conclusion.
No one has even talked about whether or not these kids actually did what they're accused of. I've heard no alibi, no claims of innocence, etc. Are you saying that the Jena 6 were at the Dairy Queen when all this took place?
His jury was all white. Why? Jena, LA is 88% white. 100 jury summons were sent out. 50 people showed up. Of those 50, all were white. The jury was chosen from that pool.
Of course, now you have to make the argument that because these jurors were white, they were incapable of being unbiased.
|
NOBODY IS SAYING ANYONE IS INNOCENT!!!!
But correct me if I am wrong....the law as it stands in this country, supposedly gives everyone the RIGHT to have a fair trial by a jury of his peers....?
Think about that logic...you are trying this boy as an adult, with an inept PD and a jury NOT of his peers.....please tell me WHY you think that is fair.....and they are trying to sentence him for 80 YEARS??????
I wanna meet the asswhupping that lets someone go party several hrs later that is worth 80 years!!!!
Now if they killed the boy....then hey.....80 years would be fair.
And you think after all that has happened and knowing that this place still has a 1950's mentality that he stand a fair chance of them being UNBIASED?
Man, please.....
again....just quit while you are behind.
Threaded Mode
