|
Honestly, is there any reason (besides the small-% cut taken by a CC company, which I believe has already been addressed) why a contractor or 'small business' would take up to TWENTY PERCENT off, other than the 'advantages' afforded by untraceable cash transactions?
Interestingly, 20% would be slightly below the tax burden on that item . . . hm, odd.
"Cash flow" can't be correct, since small businesses almost always live off their credit line for day-to-day costs anyway (and the amount of time needed to make another payment, say check, 'liquid' seems negligible in the grand scheme of things) . . . anything else?
Also, why don't larger businesses do this? Why do many large companies specifically avoid dealing with cash transactions?
|
Threaded Mode
