Quote:
Originally Posted by midwesterngirl
There have been a few national officers on this board who have asked that the information be limited. Unfortunately their concerns weren't taken very seriously by the former mod. That has been part of the problem from the beginning. Incorrect and unneeded information was being allowed to circulate and wasn't being stopped like it should have been. From there other problems arose and were blown totally out of proportion. I personally wish the forum to be deleted all together but if it isn't going to be,there needs to be a much much tighter reign on it.
|
If there is a disagreement here about this, then I will step in and say BS
For your information, I worked my rear off on this thread when I was Mod and do not forget it. navan and I worked on this together and now Her Post was deleted which I find distastful for the choice.
Whether some Female GLOs do not want to publicize it, that is fine.
But it has been seen by many and of those who AIed into what ever Sororitys.
I think the statement that someone made above that many AIs are now against the thread are incorrect because I can think of only one who is adament about it and if it was not for AI, she would not even have a voice.
AIing is a fact of life now and will be more in the future.
Snide remarks about those that do AI as shopping and looking for the easy way out are very wrong. Look at how long it took some very fine ladys to AI who I am sure feel degraded by the way it has been bantered about and with all of the name calling to go along with it.
Are these AIed members second class, not hardly, are they full fledged members, yes.
Why do not some of You snarks appologize the Ladies who have AIed.
They desearve it!
Oh, from the former MOD who is glad I do not have to put up with the crap that the two new MODs are getting now and wrongfully so!
Threaded Mode
