» GC Stats |
Members: 329,570
Threads: 115,661
Posts: 2,204,577
|
Welcome to our newest member, bluberrybellini |
|
 |
|

04-05-2007, 09:02 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 9,971
|
|
Giving this one a big ol' bump...
I have a group of classmates I'm pretty close with. One of the girls is getting married in May and sent out her invitations this week...she didn't "and guest" me. I've been in a relationship with my boyfriend as long as this girl has been with her fiance, but I guess technically it's okay she didn't +1 me since the rules of etiquette say you should be engaged or shacking up before it's mandatory. However, another girl in our study group is MARRIED and her husband did not get invited. WTF?
|

04-06-2007, 03:10 PM
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hotel Oceanview
Posts: 34,516
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeekyPenguin
Giving this one a big ol' bump...
I have a group of classmates I'm pretty close with. One of the girls is getting married in May and sent out her invitations this week...she didn't "and guest" me. I've been in a relationship with my boyfriend as long as this girl has been with her fiance, but I guess technically it's okay she didn't +1 me since the rules of etiquette say you should be engaged or shacking up before it's mandatory. However, another girl in our study group is MARRIED and her husband did not get invited. WTF?
|
She might not have a lot of $ to burn and therefore, only wants to invite/pay for the dinners of people she actually knows, not for their significant others.
__________________
It is all 33girl's fault. ~DrPhil
|

04-06-2007, 03:11 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 9,971
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 33girl
She might not have a lot of $ to burn and therefore, only wants to invite/pay for the dinners of people she actually knows, not for their significant others.
|
But to not invite somebody's husband? I always thought spouses were mandatory.
|

04-06-2007, 05:58 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Washington, DC by way of South Carolina
Posts: 1,420
|
|
I always thought that spouses are mandatory when following proper etiquette.
__________________
Zeta Phi Beta Sorority, Inc.
"...and be a friend to man."
|

04-06-2007, 07:34 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,648
|
|
I agree with GP and 1920. Spouses and fiances/fiancees are to be included with guests you actually know, boyfriends are not necessarily included.
__________________
....but some are more equal than others.
|

04-06-2007, 09:28 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Michigan
Posts: 7,867
|
|
Honestly, in that situation I would call the bride and ask if there was a mistake on my RSVP card. And then, if my husband was not invited I would say flat out I wasn't coming.
When I was engaged, a friend of mine was getting married and when she sent me an invite it said my name "and guest." I thought that was kinda rude considering she had met my then-fiance and we had been out to dinner a few times together.
__________________
AGD
|

04-07-2007, 02:34 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
Posts: 1,729
|
|
My old roommate addressed my invitation to her wedding not only to me, but to a guy I was good friends with and had a crush on. For real, she put his name on the invitation. And the place card at the rehearsal dinner, in spite of the fact that he was out of town and couldn't come to either... (we had rsvp'd in plenty of time for her to change it.) I brought another guy. He didn't like being called by the wrong name all night.
__________________
Sorry, I can’t. It’s baseball/basketball/archery season.
Alpha Chi Omega
Me.
|

04-09-2007, 04:28 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Who wants to know???
Posts: 284
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wine&SilverBlue
is it tacky to invite people you KNOW cant attend?
|
It's not tacky is called a "Courtesy Invitation", just to let the individual know that you were thinking of them when planning for your big day. You won't know for sure that they're not coming until you receive their RSVP!
__________________
I'll always reverence AKA...forever and a day...
~STUPID is FOREVER, IGNORANCE can be FIXED. Furthermore, before GIVING someone a PIECE of your MIND be SURE that you HAVE ENOUGH to SPARE!!~ 
|

04-09-2007, 08:02 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: my office
Posts: 1,492
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeekyPenguin
Giving this one a big ol' bump...
I have a group of classmates I'm pretty close with. One of the girls is getting married in May and sent out her invitations this week...she didn't "and guest" me. I've been in a relationship with my boyfriend as long as this girl has been with her fiance, but I guess technically it's okay she didn't +1 me since the rules of etiquette say you should be engaged or shacking up before it's mandatory. However, another girl in our study group is MARRIED and her husband did not get invited. WTF?
|
This is such a tricky situation. A friend of mine is getting married soon and informed us that none of the girls in our group of friends are going to be invited with an "and guest", which is fine since they don't really know anyone's boyfriend. The weird thing is that they seemed to pick and choose who was invited with a guest because one of our friends made a point to say we'd all get to meet her new boyfriend at the wedding. Clearly since they've been dating for 5 minutes, the engaged couple doesn't know the new boyfriend. I think the rule of thumb should be to be consistent with whatever you choose and to follow basic etiquette rules with inviting spouses and fiance/fiancees.
|

04-10-2007, 08:18 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Babyville!!! Yay!!!
Posts: 10,641
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RitaMae1908
It's not tacky is called a "Courtesy Invitation", just to let the individual know that you were thinking of them when planning for your big day. You won't know for sure that they're not coming until you receive their RSVP!
|
I disagree- it is absolutely tacky. A lot of people consider that fishing for gifts. Receiving an invitation to something you can't attend makes most people feel that they have to at least send a gift. If you know someone can't attend, then send them an annoucement or picture or something after the fact. Don't send them an invite to something you already know they can't attend.
Fishing for gifts is always tacky.
|

04-10-2007, 08:26 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: New England
Posts: 9,328
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kddani
I disagree- it is absolutely tacky. A lot of people consider that fishing for gifts. Receiving an invitation to something you can't attend makes most people feel that they have to at least send a gift. If you know someone can't attend, then send them an annoucement or picture or something after the fact. Don't send them an invite to something you already know they can't attend.
Fishing for gifts is always tacky.
|
Not necessarily - we sent invitations to some relatives (older aunts and uncles, etc.) who we knew couldn't travel the distance, kind of a way of letting them know we didn't forget about them. I don't think you can automatically assume that people are "fishing for gifts" in that case; you may run into more trouble if some family members don't get invitations, even if you know they probably won't be able to make it. For them, an announcement, etc., just won't cut it.
Anyone who is planning a wedding should just look at their own family and friends and figure out what works best; for some families, it may just look like "fishing," and in some families, you would get more grief for not sending the invitation. Like everything else, people should just do what's best for their situation, not what they saw in some magazine or on a message board.
|

04-10-2007, 08:29 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: The Ozdust Ballroom
Posts: 14,819
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeslieAGD
When I was engaged, a friend of mine was getting married and when she sent me an invite it said my name "and guest." I thought that was kinda rude considering she had met my then-fiance and we had been out to dinner a few times together.
|
I actually think that might be correct, etiquette-wise. It's sort of awkward to put Miss Mary Smith & Mr. John Jones on an invite.
__________________
Facile remedium est ubertati; sterilia nullo labore vincuntur.
I think pearls are lovely, especially when you need something to clutch. ~ AzTheta
The Real World Can't Hear You ~ GC Troll
|

04-10-2007, 08:34 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 9,971
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlphaFrog
I actually think that might be correct, etiquette-wise. It's sort of awkward to put Miss Mary Smith & Mr. John Jones on an invite.
|
Emily Post disagrees.
Ms. Mary Smith
Mr. John Jones
123 Peoplearetacky Court, Apt 2B
Here, XY 12347
|

04-10-2007, 08:52 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Home.
Posts: 8,259
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeekyPenguin
Emily Post disagrees.
Ms. Mary Smith
Mr. John Jones
123 Peoplearetacky Court, Apt 2B
Here, XY 12347
|
Now, that would be for the outer envelope, right?
|

04-10-2007, 10:14 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: NY
Posts: 2,170
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Munchkin03
Now, that would be for the outer envelope, right?
|
Yes, but inner envelope would say "Mary & John".
I also agree with KSigkid on the inviting people you know can't come. I had some friends who said they could not come, so I told them I wouldn't send them an invite. However, my family members I sent invites to anyway b/c they would have been offended if I didn't. They didn't see it as fishing for gifts - it all depends on your situation.
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|