|
» GC Stats |
Members: 326,161
Threads: 115,591
Posts: 2,200,680
|
| Welcome to our newest member, isango.travel |
|
 |
|
12-13-2006, 06:39 PM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Kansas City, Kansas USA
Posts: 23,584
|
|
So, no concentious of oppinion on the OP? 
__________________
LCA
LX Z # 1
Alumni
|
12-13-2006, 06:40 PM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 9,971
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Earp
So, no concentious of oppinion on the OP? |
Are you asking for a consensus of opinion? I think that's what it's called, even at Pitt State. If that is so, read the thread! You will be enlighted by Greeks from Near and Far! DA!
|
12-13-2006, 06:56 PM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Babyville!!! Yay!!!
Posts: 10,641
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeekyPenguin
Are you asking for a consensus of opinion? I think that's what it's called, even at Pitt State. If that is so, read the thread! You will be enlighted by Greeks from Near and Far! DA!
|
OP on message boards always means original poster. And I am quite certain that we have a near consensus on opinions about the original poster in this thread.
__________________
Yes, I will judge you for your tackiness.
|
12-13-2006, 07:04 PM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: WWJMD?
Posts: 7,560
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Earp
So, no concentious of oppinion on the OP? |
You want our opinions on the OP? For real?
__________________
A hiney bird is a bird that flies in perfectly executed, concentric circles until it eventually flies up its own behind and poof! disappears forever....
-Ken Harrelson
|
12-13-2006, 08:31 PM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,036
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Earp
So, no concentious of oppinion on the OP? |
So, no schooling?
|
12-14-2006, 12:18 AM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Greater NorthEast
Posts: 3,185
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by macallan25
So, no schooling?
|
Tom;
PLEASE do what I did-down load the spell check plug in.
It was not working for awhile; have to guess that John renewed contract.
|
12-14-2006, 12:25 AM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,255
|
|
|
Is there a "grasping the english language" plug-in?
|
12-14-2006, 12:29 AM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: 33girl's campaign manager
Posts: 2,881
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shinerbock
Is there a "grasping the english language" plug-in?
|
Yes, but there isn't one for Earpese.
__________________
I'll take trainwreck for 100 Alex.
And Jesus speaketh, "do unto others as they did unto you because the bitches deserve it".
|
12-14-2006, 04:19 PM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Kansas City, Kansas USA
Posts: 23,584
|
|
That is Earpspeak thank you! 
So now that everyone is so un worried about spelling, what about the origninal question?
So, Reagan won, and everyone thinks He was great, He played a very good role of President and was loved.
Kennedy was around in the Legislature and had daddys money behind him!
He, Clinton, Carter, IKE, were right for their times. Has not History proven differently at times?
One of the under deemed President material was the Vice President under FDR who died unexpectedly by the name of Harry Truman.
So, what does the Big O bring to the table? For that fact what does The Hillary bring to the table? 
__________________
LCA
LX Z # 1
Alumni
|
12-14-2006, 04:30 PM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2002
Location: A dark and very expensive forest
Posts: 12,731
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Earp
So, Reagan won, and everyone thinks He was great, He played a very good role of President and was loved.
Clinton [and] Carter . . . were right for their times. Has not History proven differently at times?
|
I know lots of people who would dispute these assertions and would say that history has proven or will prove differently with Carter, Reagan and Clinton.
__________________
AMONG MEN HARMONY
18▲98
|
12-14-2006, 04:35 PM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 9,971
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MysticCat
I know lots of people who would dispute these assertions and would say that history has proven or will prove differently with Carter, Reagan and Clinton.
|
I was just about to say that in a not-so-eloquent or polite manner. 
|
12-14-2006, 05:15 PM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: New England
Posts: 9,328
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Earp
That is Earpspeak thank you!
So now that everyone is so un worried about spelling, what about the origninal question?
So, Reagan won, and everyone thinks He was great, He played a very good role of President and was loved.
Kennedy was around in the Legislature and had daddys money behind him!
He, Clinton, Carter, IKE, were right for their times. Has not History proven differently at times?
One of the under deemed President material was the Vice President under FDR who died unexpectedly by the name of Harry Truman.
So, what does the Big O bring to the table? For that fact what does The Hillary bring to the table? |
Someone could have issue with each one of these contentions. It takes quite a while to be able to judge a President's tenure, and there have been pretty fierce debates on the ability of Kennedy, Truman, and many others. It's just a very subjective judgment in most cases.
It's a bit too soon to start judging Clinton or even Reagan at this point.
|
12-14-2006, 05:40 PM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,255
|
|
|
Reagan will be viewed fondly. Clinton will too, although in a schoolboy got-in-trouble-but-we-love-him kinda way. Carter will be viewed as a complete failure, because thats what he was. His recent actions certainly aren't helping.
|
12-14-2006, 08:14 PM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Kansas City, Kansas USA
Posts: 23,584
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shinerbock
Reagan will be viewed fondly. Clinton will too, although in a schoolboy got-in-trouble-but-we-love-him kinda way. Carter will be viewed as a complete failure, because thats what he was. His recent actions certainly aren't helping.
|
Agree whole heartedly!
Clinton who is vilified by the Bush Adm. was times good for people. But said tough timew were his fault not the B Adm.
Reagan was a popular President who was almost assinated.
Carter was, well, he was a judgemental call and won.
Kennedy was a very Charismatic speaker and was trying to do the right thing until his untimely death.
IKE a war hero and did the start of the Internet Highway system.
So, give me a poor boy from Missouri named Truman.
__________________
LCA
LX Z # 1
Alumni
|
12-15-2006, 06:34 PM
|
|
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Posts: 18,653
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Earp
So, give me a poor boy from Missouri named Truman. |
Of course you'd choose a chop.
__________________
SN -SINCE 1869-
"EXCELLING WITH HONOR"
S N E T T
Mu Tau 5, Central Oklahoma
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
