GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > General Chat Topics > News & Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

» GC Stats
Members: 331,895
Threads: 115,724
Posts: 2,207,975
Welcome to our newest member, zamasonfraceso5
» Online Users: 2,296
1 members and 2,295 guests
Cookiez17
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-03-2004, 09:03 PM
James James is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: NY
Posts: 8,594
Send a message via ICQ to James Send a message via AIM to James
Well the UN doesn't have troops. Give them a standing army if you want them to intervene a lot . . . .

Quote:
Originally posted by ktsnake
This is why the entire UN should be disregarded as a "peace keeping entity". That's only going to work if your country is European or you are in a country that has valuable resources.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-17-2006, 01:14 PM
southernelle25 southernelle25 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 266
Quote:
Originally Posted by James View Post
Well the UN doesn't have troops. Give them a standing army if you want them to intervene a lot . . . .
The UN tends not to involve itself in civil wars unless and until it becomes a state versus state conflict. Darfur is a war between neighboring people of the same race, religion, and cultural background. The UN figures, correctly perhaps, that is for local people to resolve. If the AU was stronger and less corrupt, then it could answer the call effectively. The best case scenario would be for that organization to take control of the situation - not the UN. Instead, the AU is a laughing stock.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.