GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > General Chat Topics > Chit Chat
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Chit Chat The Chit Chat forum is for discussions that do not fit into the forum topics listed below.

» GC Stats
Members: 329,768
Threads: 115,673
Posts: 2,205,400
Welcome to our newest member, vogatik
» Online Users: 9,547
0 members and 9,547 guests
No Members online
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-06-2025, 10:19 PM
cheerfulgreek cheerfulgreek is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 16,133
Quote:
Originally Posted by naraht View Post
So if, to you, chromosomes determine, is it the existence of a Y chromosome that determines gender regardless of what you can see about the person? If the cells have a Y chromosome, but Breasts, a Vagina and no facial hair, that's a guy, right? Even if they by inspection with the naked eye, the child looks female, once the Chromosomes have been looked at, that's a boy?

Part of the reasons that cis/trans in sexual characteristics is so complicated is that instead of measuring one thing, thirty or more are measured. Do they normally line up in 97% (more or less) of the population, sure. But the 3% exists.

And *that* is complete ignoring the Psychology...
First, that “to you” part is really cute, but chromosomes being the blueprint for sex isn’t a personal opinion, it’s biology 101. Doctors don’t say, “What do you feel like today?” They run a karyotype if there’s an actual medical anomaly.

Second, you’re describing real disorders of sexual development, which exist, yes. But you just proved my point again. When the visible anatomy doesn’t line up, guess what? They look at the chromosomes to figure it out. Because the blueprint doesn’t lie.

So you’re basically saying, “If a rare glitch happens, does that mean the whole blueprint is flexible?” No. A glitch doesn’t rewrite the design for the other 97%.

And tossing in “psychology” at the end doesn’t change chromosomes either. Feelings can’t swap a Y for an X.

So “to you”? Nope. It’s not to me. It’s just how DNA works.

Hope that clears up the confusion.
__________________
Phi Sigma
Biological Sciences Honor Society
“Daisies that bring you joy are better than roses that bring you sorrow. If I had my life to live over, I'd pick more Daisies!”

Last edited by cheerfulgreek; 07-06-2025 at 10:55 PM. Reason: Typo
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-08-2025, 04:07 PM
naraht naraht is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Rockville,MD,USA
Posts: 3,543
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheerfulgreek View Post
First, that “to you” part is really cute, but chromosomes being the blueprint for sex isn’t a personal opinion, it’s biology 101. Doctors don’t say, “What do you feel like today?” They run a karyotype if there’s an actual medical anomaly.

Second, you’re describing real disorders of sexual development, which exist, yes. But you just proved my point again. When the visible anatomy doesn’t line up, guess what? They look at the chromosomes to figure it out. Because the blueprint doesn’t lie.

So you’re basically saying, “If a rare glitch happens, does that mean the whole blueprint is flexible?” No. A glitch doesn’t rewrite the design for the other 97%.

And tossing in “psychology” at the end doesn’t change chromosomes either. Feelings can’t swap a Y for an X.

So “to you”? Nope. It’s not to me. It’s just how DNA works.

Hope that clears up the confusion.
So existance of Y chromosome determines it for you, not what you can see externally, regardless of whether that infant looks like most babies with XX.
__________________
Because "undergrads, please abandon your national policies and make something up" will end well --KnightShadow
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-08-2025, 05:53 PM
cheerfulgreek cheerfulgreek is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 16,133
Quote:
Originally Posted by naraht View Post
So existance of Y chromosome determines it for you, not what you can see externally, regardless of whether that infant looks like most babies with XX.
You keep asking the same question but skipping the answer. If the outside doesn’t match, doctors don’t just guess, they run a karyotype because chromosomes settle what the anatomy can’t.

That’s not my rule, that’s medicine. You’re proving my point every time you circle back, lol.

I’m not going to let you pretend you’re discovering new ground when you’re just going in circles.
__________________
Phi Sigma
Biological Sciences Honor Society
“Daisies that bring you joy are better than roses that bring you sorrow. If I had my life to live over, I'd pick more Daisies!”
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-08-2025, 07:45 PM
naraht naraht is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Rockville,MD,USA
Posts: 3,543
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheerfulgreek View Post
You keep asking the same question but skipping the answer. If the outside doesn’t match, doctors don’t just guess, they run a karyotype because chromosomes settle what the anatomy can’t.

That’s not my rule, that’s medicine. You’re proving my point every time you circle back, lol.

I’m not going to let you pretend you’re discovering new ground when you’re just going in circles.
Karyotypes are only run if there is some reason to. If the body looks "Female Normal", why run a Karyotype that would show that there is a Y?
__________________
Because "undergrads, please abandon your national policies and make something up" will end well --KnightShadow
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-08-2025, 08:21 PM
cheerfulgreek cheerfulgreek is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 16,133
Quote:
Originally Posted by naraht View Post
Karyotypes are only run if there is some reason to. If the body looks "Female Normal", why run a Karyotype that would show that there is a Y?
…. Umm.. when you do look, it’s the final answer. The blueprint settles the mismatch. And when you don’t look, you’re just assuming the blueprint matches the appearance, so you’re still trusting the blueprint. So you’re admitting the blueprint matters so much you only test when you suspect it might not match — meaning the blueprint’s the standard. So, you just proved my point… again.

You’re not throwing me off, naraht, you’re just proving my point on repeat, lol. It’s like, you keep dressing the same question in new outfits.
__________________
Phi Sigma
Biological Sciences Honor Society
“Daisies that bring you joy are better than roses that bring you sorrow. If I had my life to live over, I'd pick more Daisies!”
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-08-2025, 11:35 PM
Phrozen Sands Phrozen Sands is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 4,196
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheerfulgreek View Post
You keep asking the same question but skipping the answer. If the outside doesn’t match, doctors don’t just guess, they run a karyotype because chromosomes settle what the anatomy can’t.

That’s not my rule, that’s medicine. You’re proving my point every time you circle back, lol.

I’m not going to let you pretend you’re discovering new ground when you’re just going in circles.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheerfulgreek View Post
…. Umm.. when you do look, it’s the final answer. The blueprint settles the mismatch. And when you don’t look, you’re just assuming the blueprint matches the appearance, so you’re still trusting the blueprint. So you’re admitting the blueprint matters so much you only test when you suspect it might not match — meaning the blueprint’s the standard. So, you just proved my point… again.

You’re not throwing me off, naraht, you’re just proving my point on repeat, lol. It’s like, you keep dressing the same question in new outfits.
LMAO! I hollered.
__________________
1906
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-10-2025, 08:35 AM
Phrozen Sands Phrozen Sands is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 4,196
I’m still over here trippin that (according to Belle) black folks are “equal” to a weirdo asking for acceptance into a predominantly white GLO, as if they’re the “standard”.
__________________
1906
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-10-2025, 08:59 AM
33girl 33girl is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hotel Oceanview
Posts: 34,519
I just tried that link in the other thread and it didn't work.

Also gay couples have been roommates and dormmates since the dawn of time. They just didn't talk about it.
__________________
It is all 33girl's fault. ~DrPhil
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-10-2025, 02:00 PM
Zach Zach is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2023
Location: Houston
Posts: 388
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phrozen Sands View Post
I’m still over here trippin that (according to Belle) black folks are “equal” to a weirdo asking for acceptance into a predominantly white GLO, as if they’re the “standard”.
But are they really the standard? The traditional?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-10-2025, 02:46 PM
Phrozen Sands Phrozen Sands is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 4,196
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zach View Post
But are they really the standard? The traditional?
She insinuated it in so many words. Like her shit is the norm while the weirdos and black peoples are “other” Lol.
__________________
1906
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-10-2025, 05:25 PM
Zach Zach is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2023
Location: Houston
Posts: 388
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phrozen Sands View Post
She insinuated it in so many words. Like her shit is the norm while the weirdos and black peoples are “other” Lol.
I’m not checking your post to call you out, because you’re not wrong to trip over that. But let’s really frame this with a little context, because the idea that predominantly white fraternities and sororities are the “standard” for Greek life is honestly kind of shaky when you look at the bigger historical lens.

Let’s look at the Greek letters themselves. The letters didn’t originate in isolation. The Greek alphabet evolved from the Phoenician script, which was heavily influenced by ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs, meaning Africa and the Mediterranean were the real blueprint for what would become the Greek letters you see today. So even the symbols that white GLOs hold up as “traditional” trace back to Black and brown civilizations.

Go back to us, The Divine Nine. We didn’t just copy what was already there. We turned it into something new, a cultural institution that combined community service, scholarship, social justice, and cultural preservation. It wasn’t imitation, it was transformation.

So yeah, historically white fraternities were first in this country on paper, but that’s not the same thing as defining what Greek life became for Black people. We took an idea that started as a closed door and made it open-hearted for our communities. We planted it in culture, and that’s why it lives.

Are they really the “standard”? Or were they just the starting point? Because there’s a difference. And the difference is what keeps us enduring long after the party’s over. If you look at ours in comparison to theirs, I don’t know why you care or why her comment bothered you. Why are you offended? If you knew your history and knew that when you give Black people an inch, we go a 100 miles with it, I don’t think what was said would eat at you like it’s doing. When they make false comments like that, you really shouldn’t care and it shouldn’t bother you.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.