Unarmed man beaten by police

[Kevin]

Originally Posted by Phrozen Sands

He has no criminal record, but how would the jury know about the drugs being planted or not being planted if it's the police officers words against his? I'm asking because in some cases the jury can make some really awkward decisions that lead to wrong conclusions.

All of the officers wouldn't have switched off their mics if they didn't have anything to hide. And I've known cops to charge suspects and plant evidence to cover up the officer's own wrongdoing. You're right.. juries are fickle...

[Phrozen Sands]

Originally Posted by Kevin

All of the officers wouldn't have switched off their mics if they didn't have anything to hide. And I've known cops to charge suspects and plant evidence to cover up the officer's own wrongdoing. You're right.. juries are fickle...

Makes sense. There should be some kind of psych evaluation every 6 months to a year for police officers because it's getting out of hand. Not only that, but the bad officers are making it difficult for the fair, good officers.