Quote:
Originally Posted by PiKA2001
Is it wise to come to a conclusion based off of one (out of many) testimony when this case was marred with so many conflicting accounts? Yes, his may have been different but there were other testimonies that corroborated Officer Wilsons account.
We can all sit here and give our opinions based off of emotions and biases on whether he was guilty or innocent but unless you are privy to all 70 hours of testimonies and physical evidence shown to the Grand Jury than you really can't make an accurate judgment.
|
Darion Johnson and Darren Wilson are the only two people who saw the whole thing.
The other witnesses corroborate both of their stories. They are all over the place. It's not an either/or.
This is really a swearing contest between Wilson and Johnson.
Hybrid Mode
