Getting a new perspective

[ASTalumna06]

And ironically, it's sometimes the guys who are determining (whether intentionally or not) which sorority chapters "make" a girl and which ones "break" them.

[FSUZeta]

Originally Posted by ASTalumna06

And ironically, it's sometimes the guys who are determining (whether intentionally or not) which sorority chapters "make" a girl and which ones "break" them.

YES!!! We should take that power away from them. If ABC fraternity is too good to have a social with xxx sorority, then all the sororities should not have socials with ABC. They would soon change their tune.

[AnchorAlumna]

Originally Posted by FSUZeta

YES!!! We should take that power away from them. If ABC fraternity is too good to have a social with xxx sorority, then all the sororities should not have socials with ABC. They would soon change their tune.

YESSSS!!! THIS!!THIS!!THIS!!THIS!!THIS!!

[33girl]

I honestly can't imagine a group of 19 year olds saying "XYZ fraternity said mean things about ABC sorority. We are not going to associate with them anymore, even if they are the hottest, richest, funnest guys on campus."

Besides - mixers/socials are only one part of it. It's pretty impossible to tell your members they are not allowed to eat in the caf with XYZ, date them, or go to XYZ parties.

The best way to fix something like that IMO, if it's really bugging your chapter? Propose a double mixer with your sorority, ABC, XYZ and another relatively top tier fraternity. You catch more flies with honey than you do with vinegar. If anything, cutting off mixers will only make the fraternities resentful of the sorority in question, on top of them being the butt of jokes.