|
» GC Stats |
Members: 332,021
Threads: 115,729
Posts: 2,208,079
|
| Welcome to our newest member, hnnahpetrov9223 |
|
 |

07-22-2013, 10:27 PM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2002
Location: A dark and very expensive forest
Posts: 12,737
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElieM
I was kind of hoping for a girl if only to force all the Commonwealth countries to work speedily to pass non-primogeniture laws. Now they can take their time and piss fart about.
|
They've already agreed, so I doubt there'll be any back peddling.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shellfish
She already has some via Anne's son.
|
True, though as some on the news have pointed out, this one is much more likely to be the future of the monarchy than Anne's granddaughters.
Quote:
Originally Posted by honeychile
I know that HRH is probably getting ready for bed, but I'm sure her face looks something like this:
|
I think you mean Her Majesty, cuz. She hasn't been HRH for 61 years.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Psi U MC Vito
Hey MC, would HRH also bear the title of Earl of Strathearn or does his royal title supersede that?
|
I assume that by HRH you mean William, not He-Who-Has-Not-Yet-Been-Named. William is Earl of Strathean, and that is the title of precedence in Scotland, just as Duke of Cambridge is the title of precedence in England. So, in England, William is HRH The Duke of Cambridge, while in Scotland he is titled HRH The Earl of Strathearn. His peerages supersede his status as prince.
Because QEII has decreed that the children of the first-born of the Prince of Wales will be entitled to be called prince or princess, Newborn-Son will be called HRH Prince _____ of Cambridge, just as before being given a peerage, William was HRH Prince William of Wales.
__________________
AMONG MEN HARMONY
18▲98
|

07-22-2013, 10:37 PM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 297
|
|
*sigh* I was really hoping for a girl so my daughter might share her name...but there's always baby #2
can't wait to hear the boy name
|

07-22-2013, 10:55 PM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 423
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MysticCat
They've already agreed, so I doubt there'll be any back peddling.
|
They've agreed in England and in principle. There are a number of countries where it is still yet to pass. Not that I think they're not going to pass it, but I think primogeniture is outdated and should be done away with post haste
|

07-22-2013, 11:22 PM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2002
Location: A dark and very expensive forest
Posts: 12,737
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElieM
They've agreed in England and in principle. There are a number of countries where it is still yet to pass. Not that I think they're not going to pass it, but I think primogeniture is outdated and should be done away with post haste
|
The Scot in me feels compelled to suggest that you mean the United Kingdom, not just England.
All the realms have signed on to the Perth Agreement, and that agreement provided that legislation, agreeable to all realms, would be introduced first in the UK. It was introduced late in 2012 and was enacted and given royal assent in April 2013. As the laws of a number of the realms, particularly in the Caribbean and the Pacific, essentially adopt the laws of the UK with regard to the line of succession, no further action is required in those realms. Necessary laws have also passed in Canada, St. Kitts and Nevis, and two of the Australian states. (In Australia as I understand it, it's being dealt with by each state prior to action by the Australian Parliament.) Of the remaining realms that do not incorporate UK law with regard to this matter and that have not already passed the necessary laws, only the Bahamas, Barbados, Grenada and two Australian states have not yet started the process of changing their laws.
__________________
AMONG MEN HARMONY
18▲98
Last edited by MysticCat; 07-22-2013 at 11:25 PM.
|

07-22-2013, 11:56 PM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Home.
Posts: 8,261
|
|
|
This back-and-forth is pretty funny to me.
|

07-23-2013, 11:26 AM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: nasty and inebriated
Posts: 5,783
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MysticCat
They've already agreed, so I doubt there'll be any back peddling.
True, though as some on the news have pointed out, this one is much more likely to be the future of the monarchy than Anne's granddaughters.
I think you mean Her Majesty, cuz. She hasn't been HRH for 61 years.
I assume that by HRH you mean William, not He-Who-Has-Not-Yet-Been-Named. William is Earl of Strathean, and that is the title of precedence in Scotland, just as Duke of Cambridge is the title of precedence in England. So, in England, William is HRH The Duke of Cambridge, while in Scotland he is titled HRH The Earl of Strathearn. His peerages supersede his status as prince.
Because QEII has decreed that the children of the first-born of the Prince of Wales will be entitled to be called prince or princess, Newborn-Son will be called HRH Prince _____ of Cambridge, just as before being given a peerage, William was HRH Prince William of Wales.
|
I meant Prince ____ of Cambridge, using his one of his daddy's lesser titles as a courtesy title, but wasn't how sure that worked for Royals. And unrelated but something funny occurred to me last night. The commonwealth realms are all ruled by a Queen, yet IIRC with the exception of the UK, none of them have any type of nobility any more.
__________________
And he took a cup of coffee and gave thanks to God for it, saying, 'Each of you drink from it. This is my caffeine, which gives life.'
|

07-23-2013, 11:34 AM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 777
|
|
|
I'm hoping they name him Royal Blue Ivy.
Or Travis.
__________________
Live with Heart
|

07-23-2013, 12:44 PM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 14,146
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BraveMaroon
I'm hoping they name him Royal Blue Ivy
|
__________________
*does side bends and sit-ups*
*doesn't lose butt*
|

07-23-2013, 02:26 PM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2002
Location: A dark and very expensive forest
Posts: 12,737
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 33girl
Which is dumb, because there were plenty of kings worse than him.
|
Yeah, I know. But it is what is. And various Prince Johns haven't necessarily had a happy ending either.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Psi U MC Vito
I meant Prince ____ of Cambridge, using his one of his daddy's lesser titles as a courtesy title, but wasn't how sure that worked for Royals.
|
Ah, got you.
No, since he is titled as a royal prince, he doesn't use dad's inferior title as a courtesy title. Courtesy titles are for those not bearing a title in their own right. Were he not a prince, he would be "[FirstName] Mountbattan-Windsor, Earl of Strathearn."
__________________
AMONG MEN HARMONY
18▲98
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|