![]() |
Buckingham Palace shares big news!
|
Wonderful news! Wishes for a trouble-free pregnancy and a healthy baby.
|
It annoys me that they still refer to her as Kate Middleton. She's HRH, The Duchess if Cambridge, Lady Kate...pick one. Did they refer to Diana as "Diana Spencer" for awhile?
|
I must have missed this succession rule change. Very cool:
Quote:
|
Quote:
And no, she's not Lady Kate. Lady is not used for duchesses, especially royal duchesses. She could be called Princess William, but the royal duchy title actually outranks the prince title, so that makes the preferred style "HRH the Duchess of Cambridge" or "Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge." FWIW, Kate's full title is Her Royal Highness Princess William, Duchess of Cambridge, Countess of Strathearn, Baroness Carrickfergus. Quote:
|
Okay, but Diana was Lady Diana BEFORE she was married. Kate Middleton is a commoner!
|
These people have zero impact on my life, but I am still ridiculously happy for them.
|
Quote:
I'd wager that "Kate Middleton" has stuck because the American press has at least learned that "Princess Kate" is incorrect and they think if they call her the Duchess of Cambridge, too many people won't know who they're talking about. Besides, they still tend to call her husband Prince William rather than the Duke of Cornwall. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
(FWIW, his full title: His Royal Highness Prince William Arthur Philip Louis, Duke of Cambridge, Earl of Strathearn, Baron Carrickfergus, Royal Knight Companion of the Most Noble Order of the Garter, Knight of the Most Ancient and Most Noble Order of the Thistle. Quote:
As for Kate, I believe that she is no longer considered a commoner by virtue of being a royal duchess. The more accurate (I think) way to put it is that she comes from a family that is neither royal nor noble. I need a life. |
I'm glad they've changed the rule, and surprised I didn't hear this. In their history, the women have been the best, and the kings were either meh or outright bad, except for the short reign of Elizabeth's father.
I'm still waiting for the psychic prediction to come true that I heard when Princess Diana was pregnant, that she would have a son, her son would be the next king (that Charles for whatever reason would never reign), and that he would be a great king. And if I'm not mistaken, Charles would have to die for this to become true because even if he didn't want to be king, he would have to accept the crown and then hand it to his son. And of course, he is getting old, so he could die of old age (I know, you don't actually die of old age), while his mother lives on to be a gazillion years old. Not that I'm rooting for this eventuality. I've just held onto this prediction (from the Oprah show) for years and keep waiting to find out if it's accurate or not. |
Quote:
And yes, born a commoner would be another way to say it. But once Kate had the right to be called Her Royal Highness, she was most certainly not a commoner anymore. I admire your geekiness. :D |
Congratulations to them! They deserve it.
|
On another board, someone was moaning about "it's too soon!" and really being a Debbie Downer about it. She was quickly reminded (not by me, I defriended this burst of sunshine) that the Duke and Duchess lived together for something like eight years prior to their marriage, and are both over thirty. If they want the big family they threaten to have, thirty years old is a little late to be starting it!
And I heart my Jamestown cousin for his knowledge of the peerage! |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:04 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.