ROWDYsister - here's what you were really looking for:
Quote:
Originally posted by prophet
If I associated with your frat. and you laid a hand on me; you'd wish you never had a hand! Every time I hear of frats. physicaly hurting a associate, it makes me pissed. Why would you want to hurt a person? Unless, your a bully, that makes the only sense to me. Pledging is a important aspect of fraternity growth and structure and needs to stay, but hazing is a fraternities weakness and sooner or later the chapter will fold.
|
here ya go kid - turns out, you and
prophet were arguing for the same cause the whole time. Prophet's point was that hazing doesn't make sense. So was yours. Now we're all happy.
Quote:
Originally posted by prophet
I feel sorry for sororities that can not have associates learn their history because their national feels that is hazing. In a way no wonder why sorority girls I have meet always talk shitnik about their sisters behind close doors. When national puts those type of rules out there, that sorority becomes more like a club, and more like the statement, "buying your friends." There are ways of stopping hazing and that is not the way.
|
And the last one - he wasn't saying that non-hazing sororities are wrong, ace. Quite the contrary - he was just trying to reinforce that history is an important part of pledging, and that tests for new members can be beneficial (and not hazing).
ROWDYsister - he was saying exactly what you were, wouldn't you agree?
Context is key - so let's take the whole statement into our thought process, not just one line.
Threaded Mode