GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > General Chat Topics > News & Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

» GC Stats
Members: 329,743
Threads: 115,668
Posts: 2,205,121
Welcome to our newest member, loganttso2709
» Online Users: 2,560
1 members and 2,559 guests
Cookiez17
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-26-2013, 11:00 PM
Kevin Kevin is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Posts: 18,668
Not sure about the standing issue. If there's no standing here, can a state prevent the challenging of an unconstitutional measure by simply failing to respond to it? If that's true, that's a really scary concept. Could a state pass a law banning the use of birth control and defend it by simply not defending it because you can't obtain default judgment against the state?
__________________
SN -SINCE 1869-
"EXCELLING WITH HONOR"
S N E T T
Mu Tau 5, Central Oklahoma
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-27-2013, 09:12 AM
MysticCat MysticCat is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: A dark and very expensive forest
Posts: 12,731
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin View Post
Not sure about the standing issue. If there's no standing here, can a state prevent the challenging of an unconstitutional measure by simply failing to respond to it? If that's true, that's a really scary concept. Could a state pass a law banning the use of birth control and defend it by simply not defending it because you can't obtain default judgment against the state?
I've had trouble all along with the California AG's decision not to defend Prop 8. Regardless of what he personally feels about, unless it clearly is unconstitutional, the people of a state have a right to expect that the elected official whose job it is to defend state laws will in fact defend state laws. Otherwise, one or two elected officials essentially have veto power over the electorate.
__________________
AMONG MEN HARMONY
1898
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-27-2013, 12:53 PM
Psi U MC Vito Psi U MC Vito is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: nasty and inebriated
Posts: 5,772
Quote:
Originally Posted by MysticCat View Post
I've had trouble all along with the California AG's decision not to defend Prop 8. Regardless of what he personally feels about, unless it clearly is unconstitutional, the people of a state have a right to expect that the elected official whose job it is to defend state laws will in fact defend state laws. Otherwise, one or two elected officials essentially have veto power over the electorate.
But there is danger in just one person thinking it is unconstitutional. I actually see parallels to President Obama refusing to allow his administration to defend DOMA. I think that the legislature has a responsibility to insure a bill doesn't violate the constitution before it is passed, but if they fail to do so, it is still the executive's duty to defend that bill in court until told other wise.
__________________
And he took a cup of coffee and gave thanks to God for it, saying, 'Each of you drink from it. This is my caffeine, which gives life.'
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New SCOTUS nominee AGDee News & Politics 222 08-05-2010 04:39 PM
SCOTUS strikes down juvenile sentencing law DaemonSeid News & Politics 13 05-17-2010 04:52 PM
80% of Americans disagree with the SCOTUS over this... DaemonSeid News & Politics 19 02-19-2010 11:58 AM
Proposition 3-17 DolphinChicaDDD Chit Chat 10 02-18-2008 06:00 PM
A posting proposition 33girl Greek Life 26 09-06-2002 01:25 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.