Quote:
Originally Posted by Senusret I
Maybe Kevin doesn't mean "ranking" literally, because I agree with him.
I think all GLOs could stand to view each other's progress in a neutral, meaningful way. Maybe not in a strict ranking, but maybe a chart. We all know that all the smillions of NIC organizations are not true "peer" organizations, but I think it's wiser to compare organizations against each other rather than internal metrics all the time.
Or look at it this way:
Executive leadership and volunteers could make use of GOOD data.
|
I doubt The Daily Beast is the best source of this information. I'd probably trust greekrank.com as much as this hack of an article.
Quality sisterhood or brotherhood can't be defined by social media followers, quantity of chapters, or famous alumni.
Threaded Mode
