12-year-old tased by police officer

[Kevin]

Originally Posted by Iota Man

And this is what makes you so fucking stupid. If you had a 12-year old daughter, and a police officer tased her for whatever reason, you would be the first mofo having a cow over the shit.

Especially if I was a drug trafficking felon who didn't take a bit of personal responsibility for raising a child who was idiot enough to interfere in my arrest.

I would never and have never had an outstanding citation of any kind, so that's just a fun hypothetical that'll never come to fruition.

Nice try though, cheerleader.

[Iota Man]

Originally Posted by KKKevin

Especially if I was a drug trafficking felon who didn't take a bit of personal responsibility for raising a child who was idiot enough to interfere in my arrest.

I wouldn't give a shit what you were. Like I said, your bitch ass would be the first mofo having a cow about it if it happened to your daughter. No, I'm not being a "cheerleader", I'm just agreeing with the facts. You're too stupid, and arrogant to even see it from another point of view.

[Kevin]

Originally Posted by Iota Man

I wouldn't give a shit what you were. Like I said, your bitch ass would be the first mofo having a cow about it if it happened to your daughter. No, I'm not being a "cheerleader", I'm just agreeing with the facts. You're too stupid, and arrogant to even see it from another point of view.

Not at all.

I'd never be in a situation like that because 1) no way in hell would I have a warrant out for my arrest; and 2) any child of mine would be respectful enough of authority not to interject themselves into my arrest which would never happen. This isn't rocket science.

I'm not seeing it from your point of view because I'm not taking a drug trafficker at her word. You apparently are. The police officer said that the child and another adult were interfering in the arrest, that's enough to justify a taser.

If you don't want to be tased, don't screw with the police. It really is that simple. That's truth no matter what color you are.

[Iota Man]

Originally Posted by KKKevin

Not at all.

I'd never be in a situation like that because 1) no way in hell would I have a warrant out for my arrest; and 2) any child of mine would be respectful enough of authority not to interject themselves into my arrest which would never happen. This isn't rocket science.

I'm not seeing it from your point of view because I'm not taking a drug trafficker at her word. You apparently are. The police officer said that the child and another adult were interfering in the arrest, that's enough to justify a taser.

If you don't want to be tased, don't screw with the police. It really is that simple. That's truth no matter what color you are.

LOL dude thinks it's okay for a kid of any age to get tasered. You're an idiot, and you probably are a shitty attorney, too.

[DrPhil]

Originally Posted by Kevin

And you're expecting thread on the interwebs to lead to new understandings of commonalities which could lead to greater understanding of...?


So very likely.

You sound ridiculous.

Originally Posted by Iota Man

LOL dude thinks it's okay for a kid of any age to get tasered. You're an idiot, and you probably are a shitty attorney, too.

Oooooooookay...back to more important things:

I can see that you believe a child should not be tasered. Do you think there are extenuating circumstances? People earlier in this thread mentioned young people with weapons.

[Kevin]

Originally Posted by Iota Man

LOL dude thinks it's okay for a kid of any age to get tasered. You're an idiot, and you probably are a shitty attorney, too.

I never said that.

Reading comp fail.

Even the individual you're being a cheerleader for thinks you're going too far.

[DrPhil]

Originally Posted by Kevin

I never said that.

Reading comp fail.

Actually, Iota Man is correct. You believe that there are factors that matter more than (or as much as) age. That can be inferred to mean that you believe that a person of practically any age can be tasered if the situation warrants it. Afterall, you stated that "any child of mine would be respectful enough of authority not to interject themselves into my arrest which would never happen. This isn't rocket science. If you don't want to be tased, don't screw with the police. It really is that simple."

Originally Posted by Kevin

Even the individual you're being a cheerleader for thinks you're going too far.

Iota Man is responding to someone who he believes is a racist, arrogant, idiot. That happened before this thread and has nothing to do with me.

[Kevin]

Originally Posted by DrPhil

Actually, Iota Man is correct. You believe that there are factors that matter more than (or as much as) age. That can be inferred to mean that you believe that a person of practically any age can be tasered if the situation warrants it. Afterall, you stated that "any child of mine would be respectful enough of authority not to interject themselves into my arrest which would never happen. This isn't rocket science. If you don't want to be tased, don't screw with the police. It really is that simple."

It can be inferred that I would support the tasering of a 6-year old not carrying a bazooka? Yeah..okay.. If he thinks that, I stand by my reading com fail statement.

Iota Man is responding to someone who he believes is a racist, arrogant, idiot. That happened before this thread and has nothing to do with me.

Sure thing. See page 1. That's not all that hard to read into.

[DrPhil]

Originally Posted by Kevin

2) any child of mine would be respectful enough of authority not to interject themselves into my arrest which would never happen. This isn't rocket science.

If you don't want to be tased, don't screw with the police. It really is that simple. That's truth no matter what color you are.

ORLY? Well, piss in my Honey Bunches of Oats with Peaches and tell me it's 2% milk.

Despite Iota Man calling you racist in a previous post, the post you just responded to (and much of this thread) was about age.

[Kevin]

Originally Posted by DrPhil

the post you just responded to (and much of this thread) was about age.

And I've been very consistent in saying that age is a factor, but definitely not the only factor, and that in this case, I definitely can see the arresting officer's point of view when the child and an adult are interfering in a lawful arrest and that specific age rules are tough because age identification and particularly cross-racial age identification is very problematic when the potential child and another adult are interfering in arrest where the arrestee is already resisting.

What's so hard to understand about that?

[DrPhil]

Originally Posted by Kevin

And I've been very consistent in saying that age is a factor, but definitely not the only factor, and that in this case, I definitely can see the arresting officer's point of view when the child and an adult are interfering in a lawful arrest and that specific age rules are tough because age identification and particularly cross-racial age identification is very problematic when the potential child and another adult are interfering in arrest where the arrestee is already resisting.

I did not ask you to repeat anything.

Originally Posted by Kevin

What's so hard to understand about that?

You are being slow as hell. You responded to Iota Man's post about age with "that's truth no matter what color you are."

[Kevin]

Originally Posted by DrPhil

I did not ask you to repeat anything.

But then again, your words said you did not understand what the hell was going on. Glad to help.

You are being slow as hell. You responded to Iota Man's post about age with "that's truth no matter what color you are."

And your cheerleader still apparently thinks there's a racial element to a police officer using a taser on an individual while making a lawful arrest while that individual and an adult are interfering in the arrest. I think he's a sheltered toolbag who may never have seen an arrest where folks interfered with an officer, but what the hell do you care?